gabby 'baby'...when it comes to 'form' your opinion is noted and not agreed with at all nor is your 'expertise' found to be of value nor interest.
I need no help at all, thank you very much and did think twice before putting you on moderation this time. Your incessant badgering has been addressed ad nauseam. Cease and desist. On Mar 8, 2:57 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > No sulking, please, orn. We very much appreciate your expertise, only the > form is sometimes a little inadequate. > > So what about BB47's complaint about being moderated? And yes, who is > presently in charge of the moderating and deleting spam business? Do you > need help? > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 4:52 AM, ornamentalmind > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > > > > > > I guess this means you won't respond to my questions PSK, right? > > > On Mar 7, 4:17 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > :) > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:39 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Where did Poly ask for your judgement, orny baby? Has the mod god job > > gone > > > > to your head the wrong way up? She asked for opinions. Mind the > > difference. > > > > > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 12:39 PM, ornamentalmind < > > > > [email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> “i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or theological > > > >> mode of > > > >> understanding things...the world.... “ – PSK > > > > >> Well, that does point towards an area of your beliefs so thanks for > > > >> this much. Perhaps you could be even more specific? > > > > >> As far as I’ve found out…reviewing human thought over the ages,… > > > >> secular and religious views often are at the very least intertwined. > > > > >> On the other hand, perhaps you are being much more literal when you > > > >> use the notion of “…mode of understanding things…”. If this is the > > > >> case, a more specific unpacking of what the two apparently (to you) > > > >> different modes would be of value, OK? > > > > >> I’ll suspend judgment until I hear more. > > > > >> On Mar 7, 3:01 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or theological > > mode > > > >> of > > > >> > understanding things...the world.... > > > > >> > On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, ornamentalmind > > > >> > <[email protected]>wrote: > > > > >> > > “…revolution in knowledge and philosophy…” – PSK ??? > > > > >> > > To continue the discussion, one would need to know what you mean > > here. > > > >> > > Would you unpack it a bit? > > > > >> > > Before actually knowing what you mean, I see little if any > > > >> > > ‘revolution’ in this context. Yes, there is a process of change in > > > >> > > thought over the millennia yet such general ‘change’ doesn’t mean > > a > > > >> > > progression towards a more accurate view. Case in point – you are > > > >> > > apparently using the dialectical view of one view being in > > > >> > > contradiction with another. While many do apprehend in this way, > > in no > > > >> > > way is that an indicator of the accuracy of such a view. > > > > >> > > As best as I can see, both can be known consubstantially. > > > > >> > > On Mar 7, 2:25 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > >> > > > I was thinking .... i agree with what yuo guys say ....could it > > also > > > >> be > > > >> > > the > > > >> > > > revolution in knowledge and philosophy...when it was > > > >> questioned....what > > > >> > > > can an INdividual know.....it kind of pitts one against the > > whole in > > > >> this > > > >> > > > struggle to know...or salvation through knowledge...what say.... > > > > >> > > > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, pol.science kid < > > > >> [email protected] > > > >> > > >wrote: > > > > >> > > > > True we have come a long way..and the word has been taken for > > > >> > > > > granted....but i would like an opinion of each one of you > > ...on > > > >> the > > > >> > > > > Sanctity of Freedom.... it is also my casual inference > > > >> > > > > that....individuality ...the modern obsession with it....how > > come > > > >> > > > > some primitive tribes...hold the community at a level above > > the > > > >> > > > > individual....while it is not quite so in our > > 'modernised'...or > > > >> rather > > > >> > > > > westernised world.....are there concepts of radicalised > > > >> individuality > > > >> > > > > in the oriental philosophy..... need your opoinions fellows > > > > >> > > > -- > > > >> > > > \--/ Peace > > > > >> > -- > > > >> > \--/ Peace > > > > -- > > > \--/ Peace
