i guess ..i meant a secular rather than a religious or theological mode of
understanding things...the world....

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 4:21 PM, ornamentalmind
<[email protected]>wrote:

> “…revolution in knowledge and philosophy…” – PSK ???
>
> To continue the discussion, one would need to know what you mean here.
> Would you unpack it a bit?
>
> Before actually knowing what you mean, I see little if any
> ‘revolution’ in this context. Yes, there is a process of change in
> thought over the millennia yet such general ‘change’ doesn’t mean a
> progression towards a more accurate view. Case in point – you are
> apparently using the dialectical view of one view being in
> contradiction with another. While many do apprehend in this way, in no
> way is that an indicator of the accuracy of such a view.
>
> As best as I can see, both can be known consubstantially.
>
>
> On Mar 7, 2:25 am, "pol.science kid" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > I was thinking .... i agree with what yuo guys say ....could it also be
> the
> > revolution in knowledge and philosophy...when it was questioned....what
> > can an INdividual know.....it kind of pitts one against the whole in this
> > struggle to know...or salvation through knowledge...what say....
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 9:01 PM, pol.science kid <[email protected]
> >wrote:
>  >
> > > True we have come a long way..and the word has been taken for
> > > granted....but i would like an opinion of each one of you ...on the
> > > Sanctity of Freedom.... it is also my casual inference
> > > that....individuality ...the  modern obsession with it....how come
> > > some primitive tribes...hold the community at a level above the
> > > individual....while it is not quite so in our 'modernised'...or rather
> > > westernised world.....are there concepts of radicalised individuality
> > > in the oriental philosophy..... need your opoinions fellows
> >
> > --
> > \--/ Peace
>



-- 
\--/ Peace

Reply via email to