On Mar 15, 3:32 am, Ash <[email protected]> wrote: > Can we demonstrate anything that is atemporal? I wonder. >
Not in a space-time continuum!! Time, here, is linked to everything. Besides, without the passage of time, there would be no time to observe that which was presented for observation. Although, when in an atemporal 'world', things simply are. There, there is only eternal existence. > I agree Clayton's theory is appealing, and interestingly my thoughts have > taken the exact same course lately. Thoughts from the past decade congealing > into two main centrisms: theory vs practice. So another project is sprung, > I'm securing interests in sustainable development while formulating a larger > but related project. Oh the mind does not take a break! Wishing great > achievements in our search, to us all, and I'm still eagerly awaiting the > debut of a certain Magnum Opus. And your insights won't go away Clayton, > sometimes moved to the back burner for a time to nag you when thoughts fall > into place or you recognize something familiar. Mine are in a flux, with me > in the middle of it clutching the wheel.
