I tell you how. Yesterday I was trying hard to not bad mouth Lee but to get across my message. A somehow paradoxical approach. I did not ask him where his moral superiority was when he went to the pub instead of teaching his sons how to swim but said something more impersonal. Now today Neil wants to swim in Lee's sea, which shows me where Neil has deficits in understanding and me in bringing my message across. Or the other way round. ;)
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > How is it possible, from a non dual perspective, to perceive the world > as dualistic in nature, and thus an illusion (and separate from > self)? By definition, this view would remain dualistic. I do think it > true that how we view the world forms our experience. From a > dualistic view, some are right, some are wrong. From a non dual view, > all views are the One/many paradox that is One. How we view (and > experience) birth and death changes as we change. From a non dual > perspective, they are only states of transformation and not a > beginning or end. > > On May 17, 2:07 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > In duality there is the relationship of the observer and the observed > > , the knower and the known , that is , there are two. In Non-Duality > > there is only One and the world which is dualistic in nature , remains > > what it is , just an illusion - i.e. subject to birth and death. God > > ,Reality or Atman is Non-Dual and duality is just its expression. >
