When your mind is clear of thought , feeling , sensation , etc. and there is just an experience of being and nothing else, what makes you think that it is God-state ? If that is God-state why are you still a miserable being when you come out of it ? Why are junkies still junkies ? If I am not mistaken some junkies have this experience of supreme bliss.
On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > I am suggesting that unless you clear the mind of thought, feeling, > sensation, belief, image - and allow it to be filled only with the > eternal presence that is you - your experience and mind will preoccupy > itself with the limits of mind and nothing more. There is more to > life. There is more to me. All ways more. > > On Jul 14, 7:42 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey Molly, >> >> Yes indeed there are many parts of the human dedicated to keeping it >> alive. >> >> The mind is a function of the brain though isn't it, rather like >> running is a function of the legs and the heart and the lungs? >> >> So without the legs, heart and lungs, there will be no running. Like >> without the brain there would be no mind. >> >> It is not hard to see that we use our intelect to study; intelect a >> funtion of the mind, which in turn is a function of the brain, so as I >> say I see no problems in seeing that the mind is used to study the >> mind, yes even our own minds. >> >> I don't agree that there exists an awareness beyond mind, I have >> throughout my short span of life experianced all sorts of weird and >> wonderfull things, yet still I say that all awareness takes place in >> the mind. When I have had periods of expansion of the mind, it is >> still all taking place in my brain. >> >> Think of it this way,I am dyslexic and this is because something about >> my brain causes certain senseory inputs to be inturpreted in a way >> that differs from the non dyslexic. This is most evidant in my >> spelling and if you read through enough of my posts you'll notice >> things like the way I often write 'Form' instead of 'From' >> >> Would you suggest that my dyslexcia stems form a place independant of >> my brain? >> >> Nope I don't think it would be correct to suggest such a thing. Yet >> dyslexcia is a huge part of who I am, it has shapped my mind since my >> birth, it forces me to approach things in ways that the non dyslexic >> would not consider, I need to think about things in certian ways to >> ensure that my dyslexcia does not hinder my day to day life. >> >> What I'm saying here is that my dsylexic experiances which we could >> say take place in my mind, are a function of my brain. If these >> experiances take place in my brain, so have all of my experiances, >> includeing all of the trances, and dream states, all of the >> meditations, all of the high magiks and ceremonies, all of this has >> taken place in my brain, the home of my mind. I have not encountered >> one iota of evidance nor experiance to suggest other wise. >> >> Perhaps though the most telling is in the use of LSD, or any other >> pschyotropic substance. When 'tripping' all sorts of things can >> happen, you can just enjoy the buzz for what it is, you can use it to >> 'open the doors of perception', but all who have partaken more than a >> few times know that to stave off a 'bad trip' it is useful to remind >> yourself that it is just the drug, and when the chemical reactions of >> the drug in your brain whare off, then all goes back to normal. >> >> It is possible to use LSD to expand the mind? Yes of course it is, >> and chemicaly speaking the same result from a differant >> meathod(meditiaon for example) cause the same chemical changes in the >> brain. >> >> Almost finished now honset, so to reiterate in the shortest possibel >> way. >> >> The mind is seated in the brain, there is no other place that the mind >> exists. >> >> On Jul 14, 11:20 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > I do not follow you Lee. The same (that you say of the brain) could >> > be said of the heart, circulatory system, respiratory system, liver, >> > kidneys etc. If they are not working, the life of the body ends, >> > unless extended mechanically. We don't know if it continues in >> > another form - or I could say, our knowing is not contained in the >> > mind. >> >> > While the brain is not the same as the mind, there is an awareness >> > beyond mind. If you have not experienced it, you may think me out of >> > my mind. If you have never had a completely quiet mind, you may not >> > have had the opportunity to go beyond it. (and I mean you in the >> > general sense of everyone, not you in particular, Lee) My mind is >> > located in me, with my thoughts, feelings and sensations - and is non >> > local, and that is the infinite aspect. >> >> > On Jul 13, 9:01 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > Molly says: >> >> > > 'it is the mind that is aware - if you are witnessing, or "aware" of >> > > the contents of you mind, what part of you is that? There is more >> > > than the mind in each and every one of us' >> >> > > That is also the mind Molly. The seat of self is in the brain, no >> > > working brain no self. When you look in the mirror you see your own >> > > reflection so it is of course possible to use your eyes to study your >> > > own eyes, why not then use the mind to study the mind? I see no >> > > problems with this at all, indeed what other organ would you use to >> > > study the mind, or for that matter the study of anything? >> >> > > On Jul 13, 6:20 am, "Tony Orlow" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > Dear RP - >> >> > > > Do you disagree with partaking of the herb which led us to the >> > > > discovery >> > > > of 0, and of oo, and of god and science? With the seeds being perfect >> > > > food, and the resins being the lost vitamin, being so under fire this >> > > > last century of war, and being the greatest source of fiber for all >> > > > uses, and being one of the strongest and most beautiful of plants, can >> > > > it be bad? If I have partaken as long as I can remember, and merit this >> > > > personal response from RP Singh, can it have done me too much harm? I >> > > > do >> > > > now the job of a 20-something, at almost 50, and do it like five of >> > > > them. I can't be doing anything too...oo wrong, right? That is how I >> > > > figure it. >> >> > > > Much Peace, >> >> > > > Tony >> >> > > > -----Original Message----- >> > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On >> >> > > > Behalf Of RP Singh >> > > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:12 PM >> > > > To: "Minds Eye" >> > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Enlightenment >> >> > > > The state of enlightenment , or self-realization , is simply a state >> > > > of awareness like the dream -state or deep-sleep , and can be attained >> > > > through concentration or substance - use. It is the mind which is >> > > > aware and as the mind is finite , whatever it is aware of is also >> > > > finite. The very fact that the so-called transcendental state can be >> > > > experienced through use of entheogens casts a doubt about its >> > > > spiritual nature. A person experiences such a state and when he comes >> > > > out of it is just his ordinary self. God-state cannot be experienced >> > > > by any being as it is beyond experience and can only be understood. We >> > > > find it difficult to accept that we are mortal and hence believe in >> > > > re-incarnation etc. The fact is that the " I " has nowhere to go on >> > > > the death of the organism , it is simply an attribute of life and is >> > > > no more on the death of the body , and is thus just an " illusion " . >> > > > This is , of course , my reading of the matter and can be erroneous as >> > > > my reason is not infallible and is subject to my limitations.- Hide >> > > > quoted text - >> >> > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - >> >> > - Show quoted text -
