All true RP…and, for those who have not re-cognized God State, that specific experience is required to know it. There is no contradiction.
On Jul 14, 12:00 pm, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > Where there is experience there are two , the experience and the one > that is experiencing , but in non-duality there is only one; awareness > entails duality , no matter if it is worldly or transcendental. Okay , > your awareness is prior to thought , but still it is of something , > bliss of which you are aware. God is Non-dual and duality proceeds > from Him. He doesn't have to be aware of us or anything, because > essentially we are His emanations and He is aware through us , the > infinite in the finite. As everything is according to His Will , the > need to experience it separately doesn't arise. > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 10:04 PM, ornamentalmind > > > > > > > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > When it comes to Mind, awareness, thought, brain, subconscious, True > > Self etc., it is all too easy to get lost in semantics and personal > > beliefs based on limited experience. > > > Some skeptical materialists demand that, in a sense, we are our > > thoughts…our thoughts are entirely electrochemical mechanisms…thus, we > > are only physical ‘beings’. This is understandable. There is plenty in > > current day realms of science to keep them busy. On the other hand, > > for those who have experienced that which is not thought, the > > awareness prior to thought or the unity of this emptiness and relative/ > > subjective thinking or the infinite, radiant oneness that is the > > Ultimate Ground of existence, simple mental constructs are known for > > what they are. > > > Molly has this one right…’right’ in the sense of knowing a larger > > view. > > > On Jul 14, 5:09 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I am suggesting that unless you clear the mind of thought, feeling, > >> sensation, belief, image - and allow it to be filled only with the > >> eternal presence that is you - your experience and mind will preoccupy > >> itself with the limits of mind and nothing more. There is more to > >> life. There is more to me. All ways more. > > >> On Jul 14, 7:42 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Hey Molly, > > >> > Yes indeed there are many parts of the human dedicated to keeping it > >> > alive. > > >> > The mind is a function of the brain though isn't it, rather like > >> > running is a function of the legs and the heart and the lungs? > > >> > So without the legs, heart and lungs, there will be no running. Like > >> > without the brain there would be no mind. > > >> > It is not hard to see that we use our intelect to study; intelect a > >> > funtion of the mind, which in turn is a function of the brain, so as I > >> > say I see no problems in seeing that the mind is used to study the > >> > mind, yes even our own minds. > > >> > I don't agree that there exists an awareness beyond mind, I have > >> > throughout my short span of life experianced all sorts of weird and > >> > wonderfull things, yet still I say that all awareness takes place in > >> > the mind. When I have had periods of expansion of the mind, it is > >> > still all taking place in my brain. > > >> > Think of it this way,I am dyslexic and this is because something about > >> > my brain causes certain senseory inputs to be inturpreted in a way > >> > that differs from the non dyslexic. This is most evidant in my > >> > spelling and if you read through enough of my posts you'll notice > >> > things like the way I often write 'Form' instead of 'From' > > >> > Would you suggest that my dyslexcia stems form a place independant of > >> > my brain? > > >> > Nope I don't think it would be correct to suggest such a thing. Yet > >> > dyslexcia is a huge part of who I am, it has shapped my mind since my > >> > birth, it forces me to approach things in ways that the non dyslexic > >> > would not consider, I need to think about things in certian ways to > >> > ensure that my dyslexcia does not hinder my day to day life. > > >> > What I'm saying here is that my dsylexic experiances which we could > >> > say take place in my mind, are a function of my brain. If these > >> > experiances take place in my brain, so have all of my experiances, > >> > includeing all of the trances, and dream states, all of the > >> > meditations, all of the high magiks and ceremonies, all of this has > >> > taken place in my brain, the home of my mind. I have not encountered > >> > one iota of evidance nor experiance to suggest other wise. > > >> > Perhaps though the most telling is in the use of LSD, or any other > >> > pschyotropic substance. When 'tripping' all sorts of things can > >> > happen, you can just enjoy the buzz for what it is, you can use it to > >> > 'open the doors of perception', but all who have partaken more than a > >> > few times know that to stave off a 'bad trip' it is useful to remind > >> > yourself that it is just the drug, and when the chemical reactions of > >> > the drug in your brain whare off, then all goes back to normal. > > >> > It is possible to use LSD to expand the mind? Yes of course it is, > >> > and chemicaly speaking the same result from a differant > >> > meathod(meditiaon for example) cause the same chemical changes in the > >> > brain. > > >> > Almost finished now honset, so to reiterate in the shortest possibel > >> > way. > > >> > The mind is seated in the brain, there is no other place that the mind > >> > exists. > > >> > On Jul 14, 11:20 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > I do not follow you Lee. The same (that you say of the brain) could > >> > > be said of the heart, circulatory system, respiratory system, liver, > >> > > kidneys etc. If they are not working, the life of the body ends, > >> > > unless extended mechanically. We don't know if it continues in > >> > > another form - or I could say, our knowing is not contained in the > >> > > mind. > > >> > > While the brain is not the same as the mind, there is an awareness > >> > > beyond mind. If you have not experienced it, you may think me out of > >> > > my mind. If you have never had a completely quiet mind, you may not > >> > > have had the opportunity to go beyond it. (and I mean you in the > >> > > general sense of everyone, not you in particular, Lee) My mind is > >> > > located in me, with my thoughts, feelings and sensations - and is non > >> > > local, and that is the infinite aspect. > > >> > > On Jul 13, 9:01 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > Molly says: > > >> > > > 'it is the mind that is aware - if you are witnessing, or "aware" of > >> > > > the contents of you mind, what part of you is that? There is more > >> > > > than the mind in each and every one of us' > > >> > > > That is also the mind Molly. The seat of self is in the brain, no > >> > > > working brain no self. When you look in the mirror you see your own > >> > > > reflection so it is of course possible to use your eyes to study your > >> > > > own eyes, why not then use the mind to study the mind? I see no > >> > > > problems with this at all, indeed what other organ would you use to > >> > > > study the mind, or for that matter the study of anything? > > >> > > > On Jul 13, 6:20 am, "Tony Orlow" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > > > Dear RP - > > >> > > > > Do you disagree with partaking of the herb which led us to the > >> > > > > discovery > >> > > > > of 0, and of oo, and of god and science? With the seeds being > >> > > > > perfect > >> > > > > food, and the resins being the lost vitamin, being so under fire > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > last century of war, and being the greatest source of fiber for all > >> > > > > uses, and being one of the strongest and most beautiful of plants, > >> > > > > can > >> > > > > it be bad? If I have partaken as long as I can remember, and merit > >> > > > > this > >> > > > > personal response from RP Singh, can it have done me too much > >> > > > > harm? I do > >> > > > > now the job of a 20-something, at almost 50, and do it like five of > >> > > > > them. I can't be doing anything too...oo wrong, right? That is how > >> > > > > I > >> > > > > figure it. > > >> > > > > Much Peace, > > >> > > > > Tony > > >> > > > > -----Original Message----- > >> > > > > From: [email protected] > >> > > > > [mailto:[email protected]] On > > >> > > > > Behalf Of RP Singh > >> > > > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:12 PM > >> > > > > To: "Minds Eye" > >> > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Enlightenment > > >> > > > > The state of enlightenment , or self-realization , is simply a > >> > > > > state > >> > > > > of awareness like the dream -state or deep-sleep , and can be > >> > > > > attained > >> > > > > through concentration or substance - use. It is the mind which is > >> > > > > aware and as the mind is finite , whatever it is aware of is also > >> > > > > finite. The very fact that the so-called transcendental state can > >> > > > > be > >> > > > > experienced through use of entheogens casts a doubt about its > >> > > > > spiritual nature. A person experiences such a state and when he > >> > > > > comes > >> > > > > out of it is just his ordinary self. God-state cannot be > >> > > > > experienced > >> > > > > by any being as it is beyond experience and can only be > >> > > > > understood. We > >> > > > > find it difficult to accept that we are mortal and hence believe in > >> > > > > re-incarnation etc. The fact is that the " I " has nowhere to go > >> > > > > on > >> > > > > the death of the organism , it is simply an attribute of life and > >> > > > > is > >> > > > > no more on the death of the body , and is thus just an " illusion > >> > > > > " . > >> > > > > This is , of course , my reading of the matter and can be > >> > > > > erroneous as > >> > > > > my reason is not infallible and is subject to my limitations.- > >> > > > > Hide quoted text - > > >> > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > >> > > - Show quoted text -
