There are many things and forms of enlightenment ,,  just depending upon
what you will accept as enlightenment..
your choice..

a while back the idea occurred to me  "When you think you know it all ,
there is more."
Allan

On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 11:36 PM, ornamentalmind <[email protected]
> wrote:

> Paradox, IF I grok your question re: paradox, apparently … since you
> broached the notion.
>
> As to ‘movie’ etc., perhaps you are asking as to its locality? Here
> I’m guessing (clearly not knowing) that you mean actual movies we
> watch. If not, your question is way too esoteric for me. An unpacking
> would be of benefit in such a case.
>
> Thanks!
> OM
>
>
> On Jul 15, 11:33 am, paradox <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Could this be the ultimate paradox, i wonder (no reference intended),
> > o'mind; where is the "movie"? celluloid or storyline? Both?
> >
> > On Jul 14, 5:34 pm, ornamentalmind <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > When it comes to Mind, awareness, thought, brain, subconscious, True
> > > Self etc., it is all too easy to get lost in semantics and personal
> > > beliefs based on limited experience.
> >
> > > Some skeptical materialists demand that, in a sense, we are our
> > > thoughts…our thoughts are entirely electrochemical mechanisms…thus, we
> > > are only physical ‘beings’. This is understandable. There is plenty in
> > > current day realms of science to keep them busy. On the other hand,
> > > for those who have experienced that which is not thought, the
> > > awareness prior to thought or the unity of this emptiness and relative/
> > > subjective thinking or the infinite, radiant oneness that is the
> > > Ultimate Ground of existence, simple mental constructs are known for
> > > what they are.
> >
> > > Molly has this one right…’right’ in the sense of knowing a larger
> > > view.
> >
> > > On Jul 14, 5:09 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > I am suggesting that unless you clear the mind of thought, feeling,
> > > > sensation, belief, image - and allow it to be filled only with the
> > > > eternal presence that is you - your experience and mind will
> preoccupy
> > > > itself with the limits of mind and nothing more.  There is more to
> > > > life.  There is more to me.  All ways more.
> >
> > > > On Jul 14, 7:42 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > Hey Molly,
> >
> > > > > Yes indeed there are many parts of the human dedicated to keeping
> it
> > > > > alive.
> >
> > > > > The mind is a function of the brain though isn't it, rather like
> > > > > running is a function of the legs and the heart and the lungs?
> >
> > > > > So without the legs, heart and lungs, there will be no running.
>  Like
> > > > > without the brain there would be no mind.
> >
> > > > > It is not hard to see that we use our intelect to study; intelect a
> > > > > funtion of the mind, which in turn is a function of the brain, so
> as I
> > > > > say I see no problems in seeing that the mind is used to study the
> > > > > mind, yes even our own minds.
> >
> > > > > I don't agree that there exists an awareness beyond mind, I have
> > > > > throughout my short span of life experianced all sorts of weird and
> > > > > wonderfull things, yet still I say that all awareness takes place
> in
> > > > > the mind.  When I have had periods of expansion of the mind, it is
> > > > > still all taking place in my brain.
> >
> > > > > Think of it this way,I am dyslexic and this is because something
> about
> > > > > my brain causes certain senseory inputs to be inturpreted in a way
> > > > > that differs from the non dyslexic.  This is most evidant in my
> > > > > spelling and if you read through enough of my posts you'll notice
> > > > > things like the way I often write 'Form' instead of 'From'
> >
> > > > > Would you suggest that my dyslexcia stems form a place independant
> of
> > > > > my brain?
> >
> > > > > Nope I don't think it would be correct to suggest such a thing.
>  Yet
> > > > > dyslexcia is a huge part of who I am, it has shapped my mind since
> my
> > > > > birth, it forces me to approach things in ways that the non
> dyslexic
> > > > > would not consider, I need to think about things in certian ways to
> > > > > ensure that my dyslexcia does not hinder my day to day life.
> >
> > > > > What I'm saying here is that my dsylexic experiances which we could
> > > > > say take place in my mind, are a function of my brain.  If these
> > > > > experiances take place in my brain, so have all of my experiances,
> > > > > includeing all of the trances, and dream states, all of the
> > > > > meditations, all of the high magiks and ceremonies, all of this has
> > > > > taken place in my brain, the home of my mind.  I have not
> encountered
> > > > > one iota of evidance nor experiance to suggest other wise.
> >
> > > > > Perhaps though the most telling is in the use of LSD, or any other
> > > > > pschyotropic substance.  When 'tripping' all sorts of things can
> > > > > happen, you can just enjoy the buzz for what it is, you can use it
> to
> > > > > 'open the doors of perception', but all who have partaken more than
> a
> > > > > few times know that to stave off a 'bad trip' it is useful to
> remind
> > > > > yourself that it is just the drug, and when the chemical reactions
> of
> > > > > the drug in your brain whare off, then all goes back to normal.
> >
> > > > > It is possible to use LSD to expand the mind?  Yes of course it is,
> > > > > and chemicaly speaking the same result from a differant
> > > > > meathod(meditiaon for example) cause the same chemical changes in
> the
> > > > > brain.
> >
> > > > > Almost finished now honset, so to reiterate in the shortest
> possibel
> > > > > way.
> >
> > > > > The mind is seated in the brain, there is no other place that the
> mind
> > > > > exists.
> >
> > > > > On Jul 14, 11:20 am, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > I do not follow you Lee.  The same (that you say of the brain)
> could
> > > > > > be said of the heart, circulatory system, respiratory system,
> liver,
> > > > > > kidneys etc.  If they are not working, the life of the body ends,
> > > > > > unless extended mechanically.  We don't know if it continues in
> > > > > > another form - or I could say, our knowing is not contained in
> the
> > > > > > mind.
> >
> > > > > > While the brain is not the same as the mind, there is an
> awareness
> > > > > > beyond mind.  If you have not experienced it, you may think me
> out of
> > > > > > my mind.  If you have never had a completely quiet mind, you may
> not
> > > > > > have had the opportunity to go beyond it.  (and I mean you in the
> > > > > > general sense of everyone, not you in particular, Lee)  My mind
> is
> > > > > > located in me, with my thoughts, feelings and sensations - and is
> non
> > > > > > local, and that is the infinite aspect.
> >
> > > > > > On Jul 13, 9:01 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > Molly says:
> >
> > > > > > > 'it is the mind that is aware - if you are witnessing, or
> "aware" of
> > > > > > > the contents of you mind, what part of you is that?  There is
> more
> > > > > > > than the mind in each and every one of us'
> >
> > > > > > > That is also the mind Molly.  The seat of self is in the brain,
> no
> > > > > > > working brain no self.  When you look in the mirror you see
> your own
> > > > > > > reflection so it is of course possible to use your eyes to
> study your
> > > > > > > own eyes, why not then use the mind to study the mind?  I see
> no
> > > > > > > problems with this at all, indeed what other organ would you
> use to
> > > > > > > study the mind, or for that matter the study of anything?
> >
> > > > > > > On Jul 13, 6:20 am, "Tony Orlow" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > > > > > > Dear RP -
> >
> > > > > > > > Do you disagree with partaking of the herb which led us to
> the discovery
> > > > > > > > of 0, and of oo, and of god and science? With the seeds being
> perfect
> > > > > > > > food, and the resins being the lost vitamin, being so under
> fire this
> > > > > > > > last century of war, and being the greatest source of fiber
> for all
> > > > > > > > uses, and being one of the strongest and most beautiful of
> plants, can
> > > > > > > > it be bad? If I have partaken as long as I can remember, and
> merit this
> > > > > > > > personal response from RP Singh, can it have done me too much
> harm? I do
> > > > > > > > now the job of a 20-something, at almost 50, and do it like
> five of
> > > > > > > > them. I can't be doing anything too...oo wrong, right? That
> is how I
> > > > > > > > figure it.
> >
> > > > > > > > Much Peace,
> >
> > > > > > > > Tony
> >
> > > > > > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > > > > > From: [email protected] [mailto:
> [email protected]] On
> >
> > > > > > > > Behalf Of RP Singh
> > > > > > > > Sent: Monday, July 11, 2011 2:12 PM
> > > > > > > > To: "Minds Eye"
> > > > > > > > Subject: [Mind's Eye] Enlightenment
> >
> > > > > > > > The state of enlightenment , or self-realization , is simply
> a state
> > > > > > > > of awareness like the dream -state or deep-sleep , and can be
> attained
> > > > > > > > through concentration or substance - use. It is the mind
> which is
> > > > > > > > aware and as the mind is finite , whatever it is aware of is
> also
> > > > > > > > finite. The very fact that the so-called transcendental state
> can be
> > > > > > > > experienced through use of entheogens casts a doubt about its
> > > > > > > > spiritual nature. A person experiences such a state and when
> he comes
> > > > > > > > out of it is just his ordinary self. God-state cannot be
> experienced
> > > > > > > > by any being as it is beyond experience and can only be
> understood. We
> > > > > > > > find it difficult to accept that we are mortal and hence
> believe in
> > > > > > > > re-incarnation etc.  The fact is that the " I " has nowhere
> to go on
> > > > > > > > the death of the organism , it is simply an attribute of life
> and is
> > > > > > > > no more on the death of the body , and  is thus just an "
> illusion " .
> > > > > > > > This is , of course , my reading of the matter and can be
> erroneous as
> > > > > > > > my reason is not infallible and is subject to my
> limitations.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > > - Show quoted text -
>



-- 
 (
  )
I_D Allan

If you can bear to hear the truth you've spoken
Twisted by knaves to make a trap for fools,

Reply via email to