I suppose we could sterilize men and women based on their intelligence and health.
On Sep 19, 1:19 pm, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > That is interesting Gabby, could you explain some more how that would > make statistics look better? I've always thought child bearing can be > a detriment to women's learning and development, indeed it could be > used to keep them repressed. In my opinion there should be > incentives/rewards for people preventing accidental birth as much as > possible, but through some revesible means that would take an > intentional effort. I am curious of your insights about Germany and > womanhood! More please. :) > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > I assume that this is another variation of the American dream. Here in > > Germany it is being discussed why especially educated women don't want to > > become the carrier of conception as much and often as they should to make > > the statistics look better. > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at > >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the world > >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their potential > >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0 > > >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but kept > >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe the first > >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the "assembly line".- > >> > Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
