Indeed Rigsy. While I guess there is some truth in that old one about woman being more nutureing, but obviously excepts occour everywhere. Being somewhat of a feminist(I had a great talk about this the other month with my oldest son, I'll relay the tale at some point) I too am quite excited by our modern times.
On Sep 21, 3:04 am, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > Excellent example, Lee! Many women were as nasty as men when they > achieved power- some relying on male ministers for advice, however. > > I don't think gender has anything to do with humanism but males have > had more freedom to express themselves. Plus women were denied a full > education until recently with few exceptions- am thinking of math and > science, in particular. Also, there's that whole beauty-sex thing that > cripples one. Anyway, that's changing- we'll see where it ends up. > > On Sep 20, 3:29 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Heheh tell that to Maggie Thatcher! > > > On Sep 20, 4:44 am, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > A pittance in comparison to potential womanhood no doubt, imagine a > > > world with mostly educated and knowledgeable women. It might look more > > > like the world we should be working toward, more of the 'caring' > > > perspective perhaps. > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:43 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Culture represses and culture is still paternalistic because men > > > > control religion, politics, war and the economy. > > > > > On Sep 19, 1:19 pm, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> That is interesting Gabby, could you explain some more how that would > > > >> make statistics look better? I've always thought child bearing can be > > > >> a detriment to women's learning and development, indeed it could be > > > >> used to keep them repressed. In my opinion there should be > > > >> incentives/rewards for people preventing accidental birth as much as > > > >> possible, but through some revesible means that would take an > > > >> intentional effort. I am curious of your insights about Germany and > > > >> womanhood! More please. :) > > > > >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> > I assume that this is another variation of the American dream. Here > > > >> > in > > > >> > Germany it is being discussed why especially educated women don't > > > >> > want to > > > >> > become the carrier of conception as much and often as they should to > > > >> > make > > > >> > the statistics look better. > > > > >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, James Lynch <[email protected]> > > > >> > wrote: > > > > >> >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at > > > >> >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the world > > > >> >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their > > > >> >> potential > > > >> >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0 > > > > >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but kept > > > >> >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe the > > > >> >> > first > > > >> >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the "assembly > > > >> >> > line".- Hide quoted text - > > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
