Excellent example, Lee! Many women were as nasty as men when they achieved power- some relying on male ministers for advice, however.
I don't think gender has anything to do with humanism but males have had more freedom to express themselves. Plus women were denied a full education until recently with few exceptions- am thinking of math and science, in particular. Also, there's that whole beauty-sex thing that cripples one. Anyway, that's changing- we'll see where it ends up. On Sep 20, 3:29 am, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> wrote: > Heheh tell that to Maggie Thatcher! > > On Sep 20, 4:44 am, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > A pittance in comparison to potential womanhood no doubt, imagine a > > world with mostly educated and knowledgeable women. It might look more > > like the world we should be working toward, more of the 'caring' > > perspective perhaps. > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 8:43 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Culture represses and culture is still paternalistic because men > > > control religion, politics, war and the economy. > > > > On Sep 19, 1:19 pm, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> That is interesting Gabby, could you explain some more how that would > > >> make statistics look better? I've always thought child bearing can be > > >> a detriment to women's learning and development, indeed it could be > > >> used to keep them repressed. In my opinion there should be > > >> incentives/rewards for people preventing accidental birth as much as > > >> possible, but through some revesible means that would take an > > >> intentional effort. I am curious of your insights about Germany and > > >> womanhood! More please. :) > > > >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 1:00 PM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > I assume that this is another variation of the American dream. Here in > > >> > Germany it is being discussed why especially educated women don't want > > >> > to > > >> > become the carrier of conception as much and often as they should to > > >> > make > > >> > the statistics look better. > > > >> > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:09 PM, James Lynch <[email protected]> > > >> > wrote: > > > >> >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at > > >> >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the world > > >> >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their potential > > >> >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0 > > > >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but kept > > >> >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe the > > >> >> > first > > >> >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the "assembly > > >> >> > line".- Hide quoted text - > > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > > - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
