Nothing important. Sorry if my humor was inappropriate. On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 3:08 AM, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote:
> You're right, I didn't. Please be courteous Gabby, you have no idea > the things I know, have seen, or the impact on my life. For another > time perhaps. > > So, what else did you mean by this? :) > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 3:34 AM, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Exactly, finding women's dealing with the world (as a landscape you can > > measure and therefore manage - aka statistics) stimulating, would be a > good > > example of how I don't think social responsibility works. Not that you > had > > ever said that! :) > > > > On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 6:41 AM, James Lynch <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > >> Don't get me wrong I found his work stimulating several years ago and > >> also enjoyed Sam Harris's Moral Landscape and I cannot remember the > >> other (Atheist Manifesto maybe). I can relate heavily with much of the > >> conversation and the plight but, alas, an Atheist I am not, the world > >> is not so convenient as to provide me a package to quite swallow > >> though I take bites here and there of a variety. :) > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 9:52 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > Really? I don't- he has a wonderful playfulness with our language and > >> > can "zing" with the best of them. He has to protect his intellectual > >> > turf, afterall, plus who can resist anyone with any sort of connection > >> > to "Dr. Who"? > >> > > >> > I am not a celebrity therefore my opinions are probably meaningless. > >> > > >> > On Sep 19, 10:08 pm, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> I find Dawkins a bit too arrogant for my taste, I would really like > to > >> >> know what you think instead. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:39 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> > You might want to check out Richard Dawkins who has covered several > >> >> > of > >> >> > our topics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins > >> >> > >> >> > On Sep 19, 11:09 am, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >> >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at > >> >> >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the world > >> >> >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their > >> >> >> potential > >> >> >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0 > >> >> > >> >> >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but > kept > >> >> >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe the > >> >> >> > first > >> >> >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the "assembly > >> >> >> > line".- Hide quoted text - > >> >> > >> >> >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > >> >> > >> >> - Show quoted text - > > > > >
