Really? I don't- he has a wonderful playfulness with our language and can "zing" with the best of them. He has to protect his intellectual turf, afterall, plus who can resist anyone with any sort of connection to "Dr. Who"?
I am not a celebrity therefore my opinions are probably meaningless. On Sep 19, 10:08 pm, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > I find Dawkins a bit too arrogant for my taste, I would really like to > know what you think instead. > > > > On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 9:39 PM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > You might want to check out Richard Dawkins who has covered several of > > our topics. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Dawkins > > > On Sep 19, 11:09 am, James Lynch <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Do you mean that social responsibility toward people begins at > >> conception? We can delineate much further, into building the world > >> offspring will inhabit and creating the precursors for their potential > >> greatness as individuals and for humanity at large. :0 > > >> On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 6:54 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > I cannot find Jame's comment about social responsibility but kept > >> > thinking about his phrase. Just want to state that I believe the first > >> > cradle of new human life is the womb which changes the "assembly line".- > >> > Hide quoted text - > > >> - Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text - > > - Show quoted text -
