I find it strange that some merely spew what has been heard on TV and consider it to be even worth mentioning. Examination in most cases seems to bring one to an entirely different conclusion from that presented by the vested interests of commercialism.
As to anarchists, overall...such a stance seems to be of value and laudable. The USA was founded on the very greatest of 'civil disorder'. Those who participated in the ORIGINAL tea party lived under the threat of being put to death until the day they died. Personally, I find their behavior to have been progressive and for the general welfare. Further, they quite rightly opposed corrupt government(s). Perhaps they were the original Boomers? On Oct 6, 8:36 am, "[email protected]" <[email protected]> wrote: > We can criticize and dissent but not be a traitor or cause havoc and > destruction. > > I think many of the present protestors are anarchists and have been > primed to civil disorder by Obama's playing the class/wealth card. > Strange than many seem to be children of Baby Boomers- or is it? > > On Oct 4, 10:01 am, Chris Jenkins <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > When I hear that phrase, I'm reminded of McCarthy, determining from > > congressional committee whether or not someone was properly American. > > Apparently, being an artist, musician, philosopher, or wanting to implement > > social platforms to help the less fortunate were all considered such. > > > Allan said that he had become un-American due to losing his ability to > > drive. I'd like to hear you flesh that out some more, Allan, and then I'd > > like to get some feedback from everyone what they think it means to be > > American, or UN as the case may be.
