Ups, it should read "one's enlarged physical mass" as sort of THE
manifestation of the One and the Many. Or I might have used augmented or
enhanced instead of enlarged. Thank you for pointing out my ambiguous use of
words, Jo.

On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 8:32 PM, Jo <[email protected]> wrote:

> "It is very much of THE thing to do today, to gather with people who
> share
> one's own view to demonstrate one's "enlarged physical mass."
>
> Gabby, Are you referring to fat people?
>
> On Oct 3, 10:50 am, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Cheers, Chris! Documenting and sharing what you see as happening is a
> good
> > thing, I find.
> >
> > It is very much of THE thing to do today, to gather with people who share
> > one's own view to demonstrate one's enlarged physical mass. I don't think
> > that it is smarter than finding new ways of fair communication
> beforehand,
> > though.
> >
> > But hey, we've had our share of "we are the people" pictures 22 years ago
> > and we won. Go ahead and do it the American (occupying) Style! Learn to
> take
> > scalps if you must but leave the heads on!
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 2, 2011 at 2:57 AM, Chris Jenkins <
> [email protected]>wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > So what do you all think of the various regional Occupy groups
> springing up
> > > around the US, emulating OccupyWallStreet? I'm going out to OccupyTampa
> on
> > > Thursday to do some independent media photography, but am curious about
> the
> > > perception of the country and world at large.
>

Reply via email to