The problem with experiencing other cultures is always how to fund the stay.
On 12 Nov, 10:56, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > Jesus Christ, Neil! I take it it is your 'wonderful humor' that makes > you think of teaching business English to get away from the deception! > And as for your old company dreams, that film has been made already. I > went to see Skyfall last night, good film, just in case you've missed > it for anti-romantic reasons. > > 2012/11/12 archytas <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > I was an addict of BBC World Service for re-runs of Hancock's Half > > Hour, Navy Lark and others when abroad. Letter From America was very > > soothing. In more recent years I watched a lot of Aussie crime > > drama and spent time with Americans in the Middle East for 'company'. > > The car bit in my history included building a kit car, a Morgan 4-4 > > and various wrecks. The VW does look good and will hopefully be fun - > > but I was honestly taken by the blue motion efficiency stuff and the > > very comfy front seats. I do business lease these days rather than > > buy and the real pleasure is not having to crawl under cars. Sue > > really chose it and does most of the driving. I tend to take trains > > if I can, but expect to have to travel more by car for the next few > > years. The thing is about £2K more over the three year lease than I > > meant to pay and it was hard to drag her from the wheel after the test > > drive. I was planning on a couple of months off in a French Gites > > with the money and some time on my own - or more correctly in old > > company to see if I really want to do something different. > > > I'm watching a film from Thailand at the moment. I had considered > > teaching business English there and a couple of years in a different > > culture away from our deceptions. The word 'romance' usually kills > > any chance of me watching a film - this one is gentle and rather > > lovely, but about to get serious in message. It's called 'Wonderful > > Town'. > > > On 11 Nov, 10:29, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Yes- the BBC scandal plus BenGhazzi and Petraeus and no-show testimony > >> of latter and Clinton but at least there is a new definition for being > >> embedded with the troops, isn't there? > > >> On Nov 9, 7:41 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > Never really imagine you as a mud wrestler rigs. How does one wrestle > >> > mud by the way? Sounds a bit like politics. I bought a new car too - > >> > or at least ordered one for the new year. A VW Scirocco - 2 litre > >> > diesel with blue motion technology that gets 64 mpg and does 0 -60 in > >> > 9.3 seconds - if one believed the salesman the energy it recycles from > >> > braking would power a small town! Nice looking beast one can easily > >> > imagine with a saddle. > > >> > Not worth diluting beer over Romney, but I have noticed Obama is only > >> > the drag version. There have been no calls for the Carnielli paper > >> > from this group. It's mostly uninteresting, other than in that a > >> > professional philosopher has noticed life slides on bull-grease. > >> > What's really in my mind on this relates to rigsy saying that Goethe > >> > was perhaps the last person to have a grasp of 'everything' - in fact, > >> > even the great man was largely outside the kick off of modern > >> > science. The modern problem is disinformation and education based in > >> > old hat. > > >> > Our most educated broadcast news channel here is C4. Last night they > >> > did a bit of a review on Britain's hapless inquiry systems. A Tory MP > >> > popped up to describe them as > >> > 1. a means to kick problems into the long grass > >> > 2. a means to cover-up in public pretending to do something with the > >> > intent of changing nothing > >> > 3. genuine and largely Victorian (forgotten) means to bring about > >> > radical change by addressing real problems. > > >> > We have a paedophile scandal here around Jimmy Saville - a pathetic > >> > and now dead TV personality. Politicians are supposedly involved and > >> > I'm connected in that my brother and father (school teachers) asked me > >> > for advice when I was a cop - on Saville and some git associated with > >> > him who ran a school disco. I got the git (who has just been re- > >> > arrested) on unrelated criminal matters. We were sure he was abusing > >> > young girls - but I can't tell you how hard it was to do anything when > >> > evidence comes from people who can easily be further abused and > >> > discredited by scumbag lawyers. My advice to my brother was that the > >> > police and wider CJS was hapless - in another enquiry I was reduced to > >> > pinning a drunk driving charge on a perpetrator in exasperation over > >> > the real case. > > >> > The other side of this stuff is false complaints and mad people who > >> > claim to be experts and victims and are neither. In recent years I've > >> > worked with an academic with a distinct tinge of madness (personally > >> > delightful) who gets lots of the child abuse stuff right and who was > >> > able to get bunches of cops to really look at street situations and > >> > see the abuse. The woman concerned would be easy to attack on the > >> > basis of her personal life, drinks a lot, shags fairly > >> > indiscriminately - and has the score right. I've just been able to > >> > interview some of the cops in terms of before and after - all are > >> > concerned at just how much their eyes have been opened. > > >> > My views on deception in argument are based in control fraud. There > >> > are similarities between the rings that form to commit fraud and abuse > >> > rings. I suspect the 'mechanisms' may be the base of party > >> > politics. > > >> > On 9 Nov, 08:29, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > What you are saying is the crimes against humanity and murders that > >> > > Bush ordered is okay? > > >> > > You need to buy a new car and put a saddle in it to stay out of the > >> > > mud. > >> > > Allan > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > > Better to sit in the saddle then wrestle in the mud... > > >> > > > On Nov 8, 1:23 pm, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> I hope the republicans get off their destructive high horse. Romney > >> > > >> is > >> > > >> right both sides need to work for the benefit of the whole nation, > >> > > >> not just > >> > > >> a select few. > >> > > >> Allan > > >> > > >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light > >> > > >> On Nov 8, 2012 5:21 PM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > I was struck that Obama's acceptance speech was prime BA - we > >> > > >> > could > >> > > >> > hardly disagree a word yet have no reason to believe any of it is > >> > > >> > happening, will happen and is anything other than an appeal to > >> > > >> > those > >> > > >> > of us with liberal biology - yet we hope it is true and don't > >> > > >> > think of > >> > > >> > the real problems under its sway. Romney was a model democrat in > >> > > >> > defeat, accepting the will of the people and praying for his > >> > > >> > opponent. More BA as the House will already be beavering away to > >> > > >> > make > >> > > >> > Obama a lame duck fit to serve with a rigsy sauce. It's all, as > >> > > >> > Goffman had it, 'face work'. > >> > > >> > People my age were all taught Julius Caesar was a great leader who > >> > > >> > invaded Britain in 53 AD. In fact, he had been seen off the year > >> > > >> > before and couldn't get his lads to board the boats. The > >> > > >> > barbarians > >> > > >> > and Philistines of history turn out to have been much more > >> > > >> > civilised, > >> > > >> > artistic and all round good guys compared with the Greek and Roman > >> > > >> > slave-based economies who left us their songs of victory. > > >> > > >> > On 7 Nov, 13:36, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > > >> > > One probably needs a critical eye to spot why this paper is > >> > > >> > > itself > >> > > >> > > bullshit rigsy - but you seem to have got there from the summary > >> > > >> > > above. Judging from the political adverts from the US > >> > > >> > > elections we > >> > > >> > > sampled here last night BS has won. Polish friends in the > >> > > >> > > Warsaw Pact > >> > > >> > > days, skilled in Soviet hogwash, were well aware the stuff was > >> > > >> > > just > >> > > >> > > for public consumption and that the World Bank guff I was > >> > > >> > > supposed to > >> > > >> > > disseminate just our form of it. They were quick to see the > >> > > >> > > apparatchiks were becoming the entrepreneurchicks following the > >> > > >> > > collapse of the wall. > >> > > >> > > In Britain one of our MPs is going on an Aussie TV show of the > >> > > >> > > kind > >> > > >> > > where they dump you in the jungle with custard and hornets in > >> > > >> > > your > >> > > >> > > hair. There is much protest concerning her triviality. My own > >> > > >> > > view > >> > > >> > > is we should develop a control experiment from this and find > >> > > >> > > out how > >> > > >> > > many we can dispose of in this manner before we notice an > >> > > >> > > adverse > >> > > >> > > effect. As an added torture we could perhaps throw this > >> > > >> > > philosopher > >> > > >> > > in the mix! > > >> > > >> > > On 7 Nov, 11:19, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > I suspect the ghost of Diogenes the Cynic is still looking > >> > > >> > > > for an > >> > > >> > > > honest man. > > >> > > >> > > > On Nov 5, 10:41 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > > This from an academic article sent to me on 'bullshit > >> > > >> > > > > attacks'. > > >> > > >> > > > > Walter Carnielli > >> > > >> > > > > We want to argue that falling into a specific deceptive > >> > > >> > > > > reasoning > >> > > >> > > > > which > >> > > >> > > > > we call bullshit attack is not anything irrational from our > >> > > >> > > > > side, but > >> > > >> > > > > rather a > >> > > >> > > > > rational response from an opponent maneuver, and that the > >> > > >> > > > > entire > >> > > >> > > > > episode can > >> > > >> > > > > bee seen as a game, where logic and a certain principle of > >> > > >> > > > > rational > >> > > >> > > > > discussion > >> > > >> > > > > play essential roles. Indeed, an opponent may act > >> > > >> > > > > coercively into our > >> > > >> > > > > reasoning > >> > > >> > > > > process by using irrelevant facts or assertions, and by > >> > > >> > > > > telling half > >> > > >> > > > > truths in such > >> > > >> > > > > a way that we feel forced to > > ... > > read more » --
