Funding is a major problem, I used to do it by volunteer work Allan Matrix ** th3 beginning light On Nov 13, 2012 10:11 PM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote:
> The problem with experiencing other cultures is always how to fund the > stay. > > On 12 Nov, 10:56, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > > Jesus Christ, Neil! I take it it is your 'wonderful humor' that makes > > you think of teaching business English to get away from the deception! > > And as for your old company dreams, that film has been made already. I > > went to see Skyfall last night, good film, just in case you've missed > > it for anti-romantic reasons. > > > > 2012/11/12 archytas <[email protected]>: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was an addict of BBC World Service for re-runs of Hancock's Half > > > Hour, Navy Lark and others when abroad. Letter From America was very > > > soothing. In more recent years I watched a lot of Aussie crime > > > drama and spent time with Americans in the Middle East for 'company'. > > > The car bit in my history included building a kit car, a Morgan 4-4 > > > and various wrecks. The VW does look good and will hopefully be fun - > > > but I was honestly taken by the blue motion efficiency stuff and the > > > very comfy front seats. I do business lease these days rather than > > > buy and the real pleasure is not having to crawl under cars. Sue > > > really chose it and does most of the driving. I tend to take trains > > > if I can, but expect to have to travel more by car for the next few > > > years. The thing is about £2K more over the three year lease than I > > > meant to pay and it was hard to drag her from the wheel after the test > > > drive. I was planning on a couple of months off in a French Gites > > > with the money and some time on my own - or more correctly in old > > > company to see if I really want to do something different. > > > > > I'm watching a film from Thailand at the moment. I had considered > > > teaching business English there and a couple of years in a different > > > culture away from our deceptions. The word 'romance' usually kills > > > any chance of me watching a film - this one is gentle and rather > > > lovely, but about to get serious in message. It's called 'Wonderful > > > Town'. > > > > > On 11 Nov, 10:29, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> Yes- the BBC scandal plus BenGhazzi and Petraeus and no-show testimony > > >> of latter and Clinton but at least there is a new definition for being > > >> embedded with the troops, isn't there? > > > > >> On Nov 9, 7:41 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > Never really imagine you as a mud wrestler rigs. How does one > wrestle > > >> > mud by the way? Sounds a bit like politics. I bought a new car > too - > > >> > or at least ordered one for the new year. A VW Scirocco - 2 litre > > >> > diesel with blue motion technology that gets 64 mpg and does 0 -60 > in > > >> > 9.3 seconds - if one believed the salesman the energy it recycles > from > > >> > braking would power a small town! Nice looking beast one can easily > > >> > imagine with a saddle. > > > > >> > Not worth diluting beer over Romney, but I have noticed Obama is > only > > >> > the drag version. There have been no calls for the Carnielli paper > > >> > from this group. It's mostly uninteresting, other than in that a > > >> > professional philosopher has noticed life slides on bull-grease. > > >> > What's really in my mind on this relates to rigsy saying that Goethe > > >> > was perhaps the last person to have a grasp of 'everything' - in > fact, > > >> > even the great man was largely outside the kick off of modern > > >> > science. The modern problem is disinformation and education based > in > > >> > old hat. > > > > >> > Our most educated broadcast news channel here is C4. Last night > they > > >> > did a bit of a review on Britain's hapless inquiry systems. A Tory > MP > > >> > popped up to describe them as > > >> > 1. a means to kick problems into the long grass > > >> > 2. a means to cover-up in public pretending to do something with the > > >> > intent of changing nothing > > >> > 3. genuine and largely Victorian (forgotten) means to bring about > > >> > radical change by addressing real problems. > > > > >> > We have a paedophile scandal here around Jimmy Saville - a pathetic > > >> > and now dead TV personality. Politicians are supposedly involved > and > > >> > I'm connected in that my brother and father (school teachers) asked > me > > >> > for advice when I was a cop - on Saville and some git associated > with > > >> > him who ran a school disco. I got the git (who has just been re- > > >> > arrested) on unrelated criminal matters. We were sure he was > abusing > > >> > young girls - but I can't tell you how hard it was to do anything > when > > >> > evidence comes from people who can easily be further abused and > > >> > discredited by scumbag lawyers. My advice to my brother was that > the > > >> > police and wider CJS was hapless - in another enquiry I was reduced > to > > >> > pinning a drunk driving charge on a perpetrator in exasperation over > > >> > the real case. > > > > >> > The other side of this stuff is false complaints and mad people who > > >> > claim to be experts and victims and are neither. In recent years > I've > > >> > worked with an academic with a distinct tinge of madness (personally > > >> > delightful) who gets lots of the child abuse stuff right and who was > > >> > able to get bunches of cops to really look at street situations and > > >> > see the abuse. The woman concerned would be easy to attack on the > > >> > basis of her personal life, drinks a lot, shags fairly > > >> > indiscriminately - and has the score right. I've just been able to > > >> > interview some of the cops in terms of before and after - all are > > >> > concerned at just how much their eyes have been opened. > > > > >> > My views on deception in argument are based in control fraud. There > > >> > are similarities between the rings that form to commit fraud and > abuse > > >> > rings. I suspect the 'mechanisms' may be the base of party > > >> > politics. > > > > >> > On 9 Nov, 08:29, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > What you are saying is the crimes against humanity and murders > that > > >> > > Bush ordered is okay? > > > > >> > > You need to buy a new car and put a saddle in it to stay out of > the mud. > > >> > > Allan > > > > >> > > On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 12:12 AM, rigsy03 <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >> > > > Better to sit in the saddle then wrestle in the mud... > > > > >> > > > On Nov 8, 1:23 pm, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> I hope the republicans get off their destructive high horse. > Romney is > > >> > > >> right both sides need to work for the benefit of the whole > nation, not just > > >> > > >> a select few. > > >> > > >> Allan > > > > >> > > >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light > > >> > > >> On Nov 8, 2012 5:21 PM, "archytas" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > >> > I was struck that Obama's acceptance speech was prime BA - > we could > > >> > > >> > hardly disagree a word yet have no reason to believe any of > it is > > >> > > >> > happening, will happen and is anything other than an appeal > to those > > >> > > >> > of us with liberal biology - yet we hope it is true and > don't think of > > >> > > >> > the real problems under its sway. Romney was a model > democrat in > > >> > > >> > defeat, accepting the will of the people and praying for his > > >> > > >> > opponent. More BA as the House will already be beavering > away to make > > >> > > >> > Obama a lame duck fit to serve with a rigsy sauce. It's > all, as > > >> > > >> > Goffman had it, 'face work'. > > >> > > >> > People my age were all taught Julius Caesar was a great > leader who > > >> > > >> > invaded Britain in 53 AD. In fact, he had been seen off the > year > > >> > > >> > before and couldn't get his lads to board the boats. The > barbarians > > >> > > >> > and Philistines of history turn out to have been much more > civilised, > > >> > > >> > artistic and all round good guys compared with the Greek and > Roman > > >> > > >> > slave-based economies who left us their songs of victory. > > > > >> > > >> > On 7 Nov, 13:36, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >> > > One probably needs a critical eye to spot why this paper > is itself > > >> > > >> > > bullshit rigsy - but you seem to have got there from the > summary > > >> > > >> > > above. Judging from the political adverts from the US > elections we > > >> > > >> > > sampled here last night BS has won. Polish friends in the > Warsaw Pact > > >> > > >> > > days, skilled in Soviet hogwash, were well aware the stuff > was just > > >> > > >> > > for public consumption and that the World Bank guff I was > supposed to > > >> > > >> > > disseminate just our form of it. They were quick to see > the > > >> > > >> > > apparatchiks were becoming the entrepreneurchicks > following the > > >> > > >> > > collapse of the wall. > > >> > > >> > > In Britain one of our MPs is going on an Aussie TV show of > the kind > > >> > > >> > > where they dump you in the jungle with custard and hornets > in your > > >> > > >> > > hair. There is much protest concerning her triviality. > My own view > > >> > > >> > > is we should develop a control experiment from this and > find out how > > >> > > >> > > many we can dispose of in this manner before we notice an > adverse > > >> > > >> > > effect. As an added torture we could perhaps throw this > philosopher > > >> > > >> > > in the mix! > > > > >> > > >> > > On 7 Nov, 11:19, rigsy03 <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > >> > > > I suspect the ghost of Diogenes the Cynic is still > looking for an > > >> > > >> > > > honest man. > > > > >> > > >> > > > On Nov 5, 10:41 am, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> > > >> > > > > This from an academic article sent to me on 'bullshit > attacks'. > > > > >> > > >> > > > > Walter Carnielli > > >> > > >> > > > > We want to argue that falling into a specific > deceptive reasoning > > >> > > >> > > > > which > > >> > > >> > > > > we call bullshit attack is not anything irrational > from our side, but > > >> > > >> > > > > rather a > > >> > > >> > > > > rational response from an opponent maneuver, and that > the entire > > >> > > >> > > > > episode can > > >> > > >> > > > > bee seen as a game, where logic and a certain > principle of rational > > >> > > >> > > > > discussion > > >> > > >> > > > > play essential roles. Indeed, an opponent may act > coercively into our > > >> > > >> > > > > reasoning > > >> > > >> > > > > process by using irrelevant facts or assertions, and > by telling half > > >> > > >> > > > > truths in such > > >> > > >> > > > > a way that we feel forced to > > > > ... > > > > read more » > > -- > > > > --
