Heh heh it alswys does Molly, as we say 'Ik onkar, sat naam' On Thursday, 29 November 2012 12:12:26 UTC, Molly wrote: > > back to the "what is truth" discourse, I see > > On Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:33:14 AM UTC-5, Lee Douglas wrote: >> >> Yay RP my freind on that we can agree. >> >> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:41:42 UTC, RP Singh wrote: >> >>> Neil , even after re-transposition how long could the brain live >>> --1000 years , 10000years or maybe as long as the universe ,but >>> ultimately it will die or be destroyed at the end - time of the >>> universe. What survives is the Truth behind life and nothing else. >>> >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > What survives is the gene - subject to mutations etc. We are already >>> > 'Borg' in the sense of mass assimilation. One's mind could be >>> > transposed to another substrate (nearish future) - our bodies are >>> > currently replaced every 5 years or so- and the new substrate could >>> > have nanobots that would allow minds to outlive Lee's 'hope'. Such >>> > substrated minds might link in super-intelligence and be able to re- >>> > transfer into more human-like bodies they learned to make. This would >>> > be a time beyond singularity. We don't know what such intelligence >>> > might invent or even discover - perhaps such intelligence would >>> > discover we are not as alone as we think. Being human or human being >>> > might be as irrelevant as a mitochondria wanting to live free again. >>> > We might be free of the tiny machines (genes) so much part of our >>> > behaviour now. >>> > >>> > On 28 Nov, 14:40, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> T9 grrrrrrr >>> >> Allan >>> >> >>> >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light >>> >> On Nov 28, 2012 11:38 AM, "gabbydott" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> > Ah! That's the extended version of 'possibly maybe' then (my >>> grammar and >>> >> > spelling checker suggests 10 instead of 'then' though)! :) >>> >> >>> >> > 2012/11/28 James <[email protected]> >>> >> >>> >> >> I am an aspect of what was, is, and will be, coextensively. Maybe. >>> >> >>> >> >> On 11/27/2012 2:28 AM, RP Singh wrote: >>> >> >>> >> >>> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for immortality and >>> the >>> >> >>> readiness to believe in an after-life or re-birth. It is an >>> off-shoot of >>> >> >>> the instinct for survival. >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >>> >> >>> >> >> -- >>> >> >>> >> > -- >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> >>
--
