Hahhahhhahahha On Thursday, 29 November 2012 15:16:06 UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
> gee I never read any thing by RP saying that God is the totality of > every thing.. > Allan > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Lee Douglas > <[email protected]<javascript:>> > wrote: > > Heh okay then, RP and myself share the belife that God is the totaliy of > > everything, although we differ on some things we can at least agree on > this. > > > > We Sikhs would express it thusly: 'Ik onkar, sat naam' losely > translated as > > '1God, true name'. Now True Name, what does that mean? God's name is > true, > > or truth? Or perhaps that God is true/truth? > > > > Personaly I would explain it this way. Before the begining, there was > only > > God, but God in spirt, God said (to steal form the Bible) 'Let there > > be.....' and thus the creation was created. Matter from the spirt of > God. > > Thus the totality of the universe is God, the reality is God and the > truth > > is God. I heard it expressed just yesterday that God was Anaam > (Nameless) > > and by atributing Naam to Godself the creation came into being. Not too > far > > removed from the Hindu concept of Om I suppose. > > > > > > On Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:53:13 UTC, gabbydott wrote: > >> > >> I would know if it was different, if i understood what you meant, Lee! > >> Circling forwards in loops, arent we? > >> > >> Am 29.11.2012 15:02 schrieb "Lee Douglas" <[email protected]>: > > > > -- > > > > > > > > > > -- > ( > ) > |_D Allan > > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. > > > I am a Natural Airgunner - > > Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. > --
