Nope Gabs, it is merely my own theistic belife about reality. You of course are free to belive differanty. On Thursday, 29 November 2012 13:15:23 UTC, gabbydott wrote: > > Does this mean self-assertion and truth construction are co-dependant? > > 2012/11/29 Lee Douglas <[email protected] <javascript:>> > >> Heh heh it alswys does Molly, as we say 'Ik onkar, sat naam' >> >> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 12:12:26 UTC, Molly wrote: >>> >>> back to the "what is truth" discourse, I see >>> >>> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:33:14 AM UTC-5, Lee Douglas wrote: >>>> >>>> Yay RP my freind on that we can agree. >>>> >>>> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:41:42 UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>>> >>>>> Neil , even after re-transposition how long could the brain live >>>>> --1000 years , 10000years or maybe as long as the universe ,but >>>>> ultimately it will die or be destroyed at the end - time of the >>>>> universe. What survives is the Truth behind life and nothing else. >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> > What survives is the gene - subject to mutations etc. We are >>>>> already >>>>> > 'Borg' in the sense of mass assimilation. One's mind could be >>>>> > transposed to another substrate (nearish future) - our bodies are >>>>> > currently replaced every 5 years or so- and the new substrate could >>>>> > have nanobots that would allow minds to outlive Lee's 'hope'. Such >>>>> > substrated minds might link in super-intelligence and be able to re- >>>>> > transfer into more human-like bodies they learned to make. This >>>>> would >>>>> > be a time beyond singularity. We don't know what such intelligence >>>>> > might invent or even discover - perhaps such intelligence would >>>>> > discover we are not as alone as we think. Being human or human >>>>> being >>>>> > might be as irrelevant as a mitochondria wanting to live free again. >>>>> > We might be free of the tiny machines (genes) so much part of our >>>>> > behaviour now. >>>>> > >>>>> > On 28 Nov, 14:40, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> T9 grrrrrrr >>>>> >> Allan >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light >>>>> >> On Nov 28, 2012 11:38 AM, "gabbydott" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > Ah! That's the extended version of 'possibly maybe' then (my >>>>> grammar and >>>>> >> > spelling checker suggests 10 instead of 'then' though)! :) >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > 2012/11/28 James <[email protected]> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> I am an aspect of what was, is, and will be, coextensively. >>>>> Maybe. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> On 11/27/2012 2:28 AM, RP Singh wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for immortality >>>>> and the >>>>> >> >>> readiness to believe in an after-life or re-birth. It is an >>>>> off-shoot of >>>>> >> >>> the instinct for survival. >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>> -- >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >> -- >>>>> >> >>>>> >> > -- >>>>> > >>>>> > -- >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >>>> -- >> >> >> >> > >
--
