Does this mean self-assertion and truth construction are co-dependant? 2012/11/29 Lee Douglas <[email protected]>
> Heh heh it alswys does Molly, as we say 'Ik onkar, sat naam' > > On Thursday, 29 November 2012 12:12:26 UTC, Molly wrote: >> >> back to the "what is truth" discourse, I see >> >> On Thursday, November 29, 2012 4:33:14 AM UTC-5, Lee Douglas wrote: >>> >>> Yay RP my freind on that we can agree. >>> >>> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 01:41:42 UTC, RP Singh wrote: >>> >>>> Neil , even after re-transposition how long could the brain live >>>> --1000 years , 10000years or maybe as long as the universe ,but >>>> ultimately it will die or be destroyed at the end - time of the >>>> universe. What survives is the Truth behind life and nothing else. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> > What survives is the gene - subject to mutations etc. We are already >>>> > 'Borg' in the sense of mass assimilation. One's mind could be >>>> > transposed to another substrate (nearish future) - our bodies are >>>> > currently replaced every 5 years or so- and the new substrate could >>>> > have nanobots that would allow minds to outlive Lee's 'hope'. Such >>>> > substrated minds might link in super-intelligence and be able to re- >>>> > transfer into more human-like bodies they learned to make. This >>>> would >>>> > be a time beyond singularity. We don't know what such intelligence >>>> > might invent or even discover - perhaps such intelligence would >>>> > discover we are not as alone as we think. Being human or human being >>>> > might be as irrelevant as a mitochondria wanting to live free again. >>>> > We might be free of the tiny machines (genes) so much part of our >>>> > behaviour now. >>>> > >>>> > On 28 Nov, 14:40, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> T9 grrrrrrr >>>> >> Allan >>>> >> >>>> >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light >>>> >> On Nov 28, 2012 11:38 AM, "gabbydott" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> >> > Ah! That's the extended version of 'possibly maybe' then (my >>>> grammar and >>>> >> > spelling checker suggests 10 instead of 'then' though)! :) >>>> >> >>>> >> > 2012/11/28 James <[email protected]> >>>> >> >>>> >> >> I am an aspect of what was, is, and will be, coextensively. >>>> Maybe. >>>> >> >>>> >> >> On 11/27/2012 2:28 AM, RP Singh wrote: >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for immortality >>>> and the >>>> >> >>> readiness to believe in an after-life or re-birth. It is an >>>> off-shoot of >>>> >> >>> the instinct for survival. >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> -- >>>> >> >>>> >> >> -- >>>> >> >>>> >> > -- >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> >>> -- > > > > --
