Since this is somewhat on topic has anyone ran across a modern rendition of the universe speculating our position and the layout? Every time I look there are irritating answers around such as "there is no center" and such, never seen a satisfactory attempt at an answer for our position within the universe (say, as one find it within galactic clusters, solar systems, etc). A graphic would be really nice, please share if you've seen one!

On 11/30/2012 1:32 PM, andrew vecsey wrote:
Lee, I can see where all matter has to have an energy component to it
because matter is manifested as atoms which have motion in them. But I
could also envision pure motion without involving any atoms...like a
vibration in the fabric of space,

On Friday, November 30, 2012 5:53:26 PM UTC+1, Lee Douglas wrote:

    Heh except of course that when it comes right down to it.energy is
    matter and matter is energy.
    On Friday, 30 November 2012 11:22:14 UTC, andrew vecsey wrote:

        The paradoxical dilemma of who created the creator can be
        circumnavigated by the possibility that the original creator was
        not matter, but energy. Just like thinking of anything is much
        faster and much easier than building it, it becomes conceivable
        that energy patterns could have evolved in a random chance way
        and finely tuned by selective processes to reach intelligence
        similar to how most scientists believe that patterns of atoms
        and molecules evolved to form intelligent life.

        Energy patterns could have evolved to a point that they
        manipulated atoms to desired patterns and forms to code the
        information required for life and to allow them to evolve on
        their own to complex intelligent beings able to wonder at and
        eventually to solve the riddle of where they came from, where
        they are going and why they are alive. Meaning and purpose could
        then be given to our fleeting moment of existence.


        On Thursday, November 29, 2012 7:55:05 PM UTC+1, archytas wrote:

            ....... All we have in respect of this is to posit
            creation, begging the question of what created that in an
            infinite
            regress. .....We might get to an intelligent state in which
            creation
            myths are replaced by something more plausible and Truth
            comes closer.

            On 29 Nov, 01:41, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
             > Neil , even after re-transposition how long could the
            brain live
             > --1000 years , 10000years or maybe as long as the
            universe ,but
             > ultimately it will die or be destroyed at the end - time
            of the
             > universe. What survives is the Truth behind life and
            nothing else.
             >
             >
             >
             >
             >
             >
             >
             > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 3:33 AM, archytas
            <[email protected]> wrote:
             > > What survives is the gene - subject to mutations etc.
            We are already
             > > 'Borg' in the sense of mass assimilation. One's mind
            could be
             > > transposed to another substrate (nearish future) - our
            bodies are
             > > currently replaced every 5 years or so- and the new
            substrate could
             > > have nanobots that would allow minds to outlive Lee's
            'hope'. Such
             > > substrated minds might link in super-intelligence and
            be able to re-
             > > transfer into more human-like bodies they learned to
            make. This would
             > > be a time beyond singularity. We don't know what such
            intelligence
             > > might invent or even discover - perhaps such
            intelligence would
             > > discover we are not as alone as we think. Being human
            or human being
             > > might be as irrelevant as a mitochondria wanting to
            live free again.
             > > We might be free of the tiny machines (genes) so much
            part of our
             > > behaviour now.
             >
             > > On 28 Nov, 14:40, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote:
             > >> T9 grrrrrrr
             > >> Allan
             >
             > >> Matrix ** th3 beginning light
             > >> On Nov 28, 2012 11:38 AM, "gabbydott"
            <[email protected]> wrote:
             >
             > >> > Ah! That's the extended version of 'possibly maybe'
            then (my grammar and
             > >> > spelling checker suggests 10 instead of 'then'
            though)! :)
             >
             > >> > 2012/11/28 James <[email protected]>
             >
             > >> >> I am an aspect of what was, is, and will be,
            coextensively. Maybe.
             >
             > >> >> On 11/27/2012 2:28 AM, RP Singh wrote:
             >
             > >> >>> Attachment to life is the cause of the desire for
            immortality and the
             > >> >>> readiness to believe in an after-life or re-birth.
            It is an off-shoot of
             > >> >>> the instinct for survival.
             >
             > >> >>> --
             >
             > >> >> --
             >
             > >> > --
             >
             > > --

--




--



Reply via email to