At least you have soul Al - perhaps in the Russian sense. RP is not without in that sense either. It's hard to be inter-subjective about god a a formulation though we seem to crave fellowship.
On 29 Nov, 23:05, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > I doubt I am a great soul, though I have spent years contemplating the idea. > Allan > > Matrix ** th3 beginning light > On Nov 29, 2012 9:11 PM, "RP Singh" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Allan , carefully reading all the' trash' that you spew out makes me > > wonder ...maybe you are the greatest soul wrapped in a human body. > > > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 12:02 AM, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > > My apologies RP, due to what I consider trash I don't waste my time > > > carefully reading what you write.. > > > > Now I am wondering the origin of this vision.. ;o) I am waiting to > > read. > > > Allan > > > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 5:11 PM, RP Singh <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> me (RP Singh change) Post reply > > > >> 4/26/10 > > >> [Mind's Eye] Re: God and I > > > >> Consciousness has to do with the senses and the sense-objects. Sight, > > >> hearing, etc. I see a door as grey in colour and at a distance of 25 > > >> yards from me, does God see it as grey in colour and at a distance. > > >> No God is immanent in the door, he is the grey colour, he is the > > >> door , he is the distance and he is me ,the observer. God is in > > >> everything and is thus all-pervading , he is in every will and is > > >> therefore the real doer, he is in all beings and non-beings and is > > >> therefore omniscient. > > > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:46 PM, Allan H <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>> gee I never read any thing by RP saying that God is the totality of > > >>> every thing.. > > >>> Allan > > > >>> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Lee Douglas <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>>> Heh okay then, RP and myself share the belife that God is the totaliy > > of > > >>>> everything, although we differ on some things we can at least agree > > on this. > > > >>>> We Sikhs would express it thusly: 'Ik onkar, sat naam' losely > > translated as > > >>>> '1God, true name'. Now True Name, what does that mean? God's name > > is true, > > >>>> or truth? Or perhaps that God is true/truth? > > > >>>> Personaly I would explain it this way. Before the begining, there > > was only > > >>>> God, but God in spirt, God said (to steal form the Bible) 'Let there > > >>>> be.....' and thus the creation was created. Matter from the spirt of > > God. > > >>>> Thus the totality of the universe is God, the reality is God and the > > truth > > >>>> is God. I heard it expressed just yesterday that God was Anaam > > (Nameless) > > >>>> and by atributing Naam to Godself the creation came into being. Not > > too far > > >>>> removed from the Hindu concept of Om I suppose. > > > >>>> On Thursday, 29 November 2012 14:53:13 UTC, gabbydott wrote: > > > >>>>> I would know if it was different, if i understood what you meant, > > Lee! > > >>>>> Circling forwards in loops, arent we? > > > >>>>> Am 29.11.2012 15:02 schrieb "Lee Douglas" <[email protected]>: > > > >>>> -- > > > >>> -- > > >>> ( > > >>> ) > > >>> |_D Allan > > > >>> Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. > > > >>> I am a Natural Airgunner - > > > >>> Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. > > > >>> -- > > > >> -- > > > > -- > > > ( > > > ) > > > |_D Allan > > > > Life is for moral, ethical and truthful living. > > > > I am a Natural Airgunner - > > > > Full of Hot Air & Ready To Expel It Quickly. > > > > -- > > > -- --
