My next questions are on what gender issues hide. But really this is just a path to people I teach choosing their own paths. It's very hard not to be directive and I usually suggest the philosophic muck means less to me than one word in personal insurrection. I might ask, in the right company, 'what the little women have to say'. One has to take the risk somewhere to break the supplication of academic discipline.
On 1 Dec, 17:01, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote: > That question is settled then. What's the next? > > 2012/12/1 archytas <[email protected]> > > > > > > > > > The Body > > Class and Work > > Disability > > Discrimination > > Equality of Opportunity > > Identity Politics > > Multiculturalism > > Objectification > > Parenthood and Procreation > > Power > > Race > > Rape > > Reproduction and the Family > > Science > > The Self > > Sex and Gender > > Sex Markets > > Trans Issues > > > These are just some of the topics I thought I could put forward in > > teaching gender issues in management. They underlie the bland > > politically correct policy matters. One thing has always occurred to > > me as missing in every debate I can remember. Women are as bad as men > > as managers. I equate equality with hospitality (always two-sided at > > least) and suspect we don't realise behaviour is much less to do with > > gender or the individual than we think and perhaps has little to do > > with rationality. I don't think we see the wood for the trees on > > gender. > > > -- --
