Rigs on FIRE!

On Jan 12, 7:28 am, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
> Why don't some of the brains that the USA has drained move back to
> their home countries and fix them? I am thinking of those who withdrew
> all their money and live like fat cats while their country collapses.
>
> On Jan 11, 3:27 pm, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > I may have to move back to Scotland to stay in the EU.  Sad stuff,
> > showing only we haven't moved on here.  I see the French now have
> > boots on the ground in Mali.
>
> > On Jan 11, 8:26 pm, gabbydott <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > You see, you shouldn't have changed your proxy settings from Scottish to
> > > English!
>
> > > Ah well, the American Empire is helping us out again, here it is in the
> > > French language version:http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqSgIhU28B8.
> > > Foreign affairs are being discussed after 46 minutes.
>
> > > 2013/1/11 archytas <[email protected]>
>
> > > > They won't let me watch your video in England Gabby.
>
> > > > On Jan 10, 2:04 am, rigs <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > > > Life has already been a game of Monopoly! That's a major part of the
> > > > > problem(s).
>
> > > > > I would implant the chip in another spot.
>
> > > > > You will have to address religious and cultural systems that promote
> > > > > sexism, racism and ageism.
>
> > > > > On Jan 9, 2:36 pm, andrew vecsey <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> > > > > > In my science fiction novel "A Short History of a Long Future - A
> > > > Guide for
> > > > > > New-man", I wrote a scenario that applies to this discussion. Before
> > > > Allan
> > > > > > starts to let off his gas, the "I" is not "me" and it IS a science
> > > > > > fiction.  Below is the relevant excerpt from my novel.
>
> > > > > > "One unexpected day the centralized data banks were infected with
> > > > computer
> > > > > > viruses that erased their entire data banks. The multiple backups of
> > > > the
> > > > > > last 10 years were also suddenly discovered to have been 
> > > > > > compromised.
> > > > > > Overnight electronic data of all money was irretrievably wiped out.
> > > > Money
> > > > > > in all of its form and all its trace disappeared. The banks and 
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > services shut down immediately and all flow of money seized.
>
> > > > > > I developed a device that measured mental and physical exertion done
> > > > for
> > > > > > doing a series of tasks. I developed a financial system that did not
> > > > > > include banks. It was a decentralized system where everyone was his 
> > > > > > own
> > > > > > bank. It was based on my device. This measurement device allowed 
> > > > > > money
> > > > to
> > > > > > be based not on gold, oil, or promises, but on human exertion. The
> > > > amount
> > > > > > of this new money was to be based on the number of users. There was 
> > > > > > to
> > > > be
> > > > > > no central governing point and the only regulation were in the
> > > > algorithms
> > > > > > governing the issuance of money and in the initial registration. It
> > > > was a
> > > > > > just-in-time system that issued just enough money at just the right
> > > > time
> > > > > > and place to just the right person to ensure educational and health
> > > > well
> > > > > > being.  The system was to be open and algorithms were to be proposed
> > > > and
> > > > > > written by users themselves.
>
> > > > > > I also developed a workable replacement for the once existing
> > > > centralized
> > > > > > banks. It was a peer to peer networked system that allowed everyone 
> > > > > > to
> > > > be
> > > > > > his own bank. It was free to join with only one requirement. - you 
> > > > > > had
> > > > to
> > > > > > have a chip inserted into the forehead under the skin. The chip came
> > > > with
> > > > > > an account containing 1 million dollars to last you a lifetime and 
> > > > > > pay
> > > > for
> > > > > > your basic living needs.
>
> > > > > >  All countries adopted the implantation of the chip as a basic human
> > > > > > right.  My system provided all the requirements that make money
> > > > workable.
> > > > > > It could not be counterfeited and could not be stolen or lost. It 
> > > > > > was
> > > > based
> > > > > > on a unique code signed with each person's unique biometric 
> > > > > > signature.
> > > > It
> > > > > > could be saved and it was always redeemable anywhere anytime
> > > > automatically.
>
> > > > > > Everyone who wanted to work and get paid had to use his system which
> > > > was
> > > > > > implanted into the forehead. Everyone who wanted to buy anything 
> > > > > > had to
> > > > > > have this implant as well. It acted as a electronic money bank
> > > > account. To
> > > > > > fill it you had to work as usual. You could invest your capital by
> > > > buying
> > > > > > company stocks. You gambled your investment betting to profit by 
> > > > > > buying
> > > > > > into a hopefully successful venture but risking to lose it should 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > ventures fail.
>
> > > > > > Your inheritance was limited to family heirlooms and houses. Your 
> > > > > > total
> > > > > > accumulated wealth was also limited to a certain amount 
> > > > > > guaranteeing a
> > > > very
> > > > > > high standard of living. Anything over this was redistributed back 
> > > > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > people who you got it from. You were rewarded for this contribution 
> > > > > > in
> > > > the
> > > > > > form of highly valued merit awards that came with valued
> > > > prestige.There was
> > > > > > no income tax but you paid a sales tax on all items you bought. 
> > > > > > Food,
> > > > > > clothing and other living necessities were exempt from tax. Sales 
> > > > > > tax
> > > > paid
> > > > > > for all public facilities and services like government, roads,
> > > > hospitals,
> > > > > > schools, fire department and police.
>
> > > > > > Within a few months of offering the accounts, everyone wanted an
> > > > implant.
> > > > > > It was free, came with a start-up capital of $1,000,000, and gave 
> > > > > > you
> > > > the
> > > > > > promise of a secure future, and the hopes of becoming wealthy. For 
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > skeptical there was an opt out possibility. Their accounts would be
> > > > locked
> > > > > > and after a year they would be able to re join and continue where 
> > > > > > they
> > > > left
> > > > > > off. By replacing banks and eliminating money speculation, poverty 
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > greatly reduced world wide. Everyone became their own bank. Everyone
> > > > became
> > > > > > an account.
>
> > > > > > Accounts below the start-up capital could spend only a maximum of
> > > > $2,000 a
> > > > > > month on products and services. But could still invest a part in
> > > > stocks.
> > > > > > Accounts over the start-up capital could form public companies and 
> > > > > > sell
> > > > > > company stocks. Accounts over $10,000,000 automatically overflowed 
> > > > > > to
> > > > the
> > > > > > accounts with the least capital and were duly credited with
> > > > distinguished
> > > > > > awards of achievement and merit.
>
> > > > > > A few people refused to become accounts and to have the implants
> > > > because of
> > > > > > religious beliefs. They usually lived out in the country and tried 
> > > > > > to
> > > > live
> > > > > > off the dying land. They believed that the implants were prophesied 
> > > > > > in
> > > > > > their bible as the sign of the devil. Greed took on a new meaning 
> > > > > > for
> > > > many.
> > > > > > It was no longer desirable to have as much as you can but to give as
> > > > much
> > > > > > as you must and thus get as many merit points as you can.  New aims 
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > goals surfaced. Competition changed to cooperation.  Many rich ended
> > > > up to
> > > > > > be great philanthropists. Life became like a game of Monopoly."
>
> > > > > > On Wednesday, January 9, 2013 4:16:47 PM UTC+1, archytas wrote:
>
> > > > > > > The human world is in a mess.  It's hard to express what is going 
> > > > > > > on.
> > > > > > > My guess is we are being ruled by a small, unelected, hidden
> > > > politburo
> > > > > > > we could call banksters.  I take this as metaphor, much as I would
> > > > the
> > > > > > > notion the rulers are alien lizards.  I also guess they have 
> > > > > > > skewed
> > > > > > > any dialogue we have to make it very difficult to identify the 
> > > > > > > real
> > > > > > > problem we face through argument.  This is more or less a 'Dr Who'
> > > > > > > predicament, though I suspect it is the real one we face.
>
> > > > > > > Those of us who are democrats (small d) know the answer.  We want 
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > human world at peace and our institutions based on real democracy
> > > > with
> > > > > > > government as unobtrusive as possible in the lives of reasonable
> > > > > > > individuals.  This, sadly, is the easy bit.  Even something as 
> > > > > > > easy
> > > > as
> > > > > > > this is potentially totalising and fascist.
>
> > > > > > > Much, of course, has been written on this, and my conclusion is 
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > can't be helping much.  My own country, Britain, has made some 
> > > > > > > kind
> > > > of
> > > > > > > decision to give up empire, but we clearly cling to the 
> > > > > > > coat-tails of
> > > > > > > the USA through the dupes or war criminals we elect - or who know 
> > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > secret case not made to us that justifies war and other rotten
> > > > > > > policies.  If I was capable of listing all the literature I've 
> > > > > > > read
> > > > on
> > > > > > > this matter I wouldn't finish until sometime after a week tomorrow
> > > > and
> > > > > > > I'm by no means a specialist.  Even if the democratic parts of 
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > literature is right, it doesn't convince me of any course of 
> > > > > > > action,
> > > > > > > as almost none of it explains how we might lay down the arms of 
> > > > > > > the
> > > > US
> > > > > > > umbrella without giving up to something worse or simply as bad 
> > > > > > > run by
> > > > > > > people less favourable to my ethnicity.
>
> > > > > > > My belief is we must change what dialogue and argument are to 
> > > > > > > address
> > > > > > > a move to real, global democracy.  We have new technology that 
> > > > > > > would
> > > > > > > allow this, but currently it is being subsumed into the skewed 
> > > > > > > form
> > > > > > > that has allowed domination through the ages.  It could be that 
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > technology would tell us we need the American Empire.  I rather 
> > > > > > > hope
> > > > > > > it would rather be a call to democratic arms and very substantial
> > > > > > > changes in what we do and can be.  Any suggestions as to what this
>
> ...
>
> read more »

-- 



Reply via email to