The Coop means the 7/11 down the road here Allan, though it opens as 6 and shuts at 10. I would like to give one a try in the living sense. Did in Spain years back but couldn't afford to stay.
On Thursday, October 30, 2014 3:52:09 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: > > What owners association? > The idea behind a coop is there are no owners. And no one can own part of > it. (Church of Common Cooperation) guidelines set up. Either you follow the > guidelines or move else where. > You pay your rent, do your community responsibilities, participate in > community affairs and activities.. It can not be a place to pay your rent > then hide away. > > All an > ~~ > do not murder, rape, enslave or harm others > > -----Original Message----- > From: Molly <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 4:18 PM > Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Who can we tell? > > developing those common standards might be a sticky wicket. I always > cringe when asked to be on a committee to review by-laws, and have managed > to dodge owners associations without exception. Oh the horror. > > On Thursday, October 30, 2014 5:46:39 AM UTC-4, Allan Heretic wrote: >> >> There is a lot of major problems world wide. I don't think realistically >> you can gate an entire town. But an apartment complex can be .. I think >> the keys lay within a common moral standards agreement and non ownership. >> Lack of ownership would allow for removal of those that do not follow the >> guidelines ... (Unfortunately i do not think a regular hanging of Me or >> Tony would solve any problems). >> >> All an >> ~~ >> do not murder, rape, enslave or harm others >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: archytas <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Sent: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 10:08 AM >> Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: Who can we tell? >> >> Hanging might be less cruel than suffering some of the cop, social worker >> and other town hall incompetence. A lot of the kids lied to me Molly - >> quite common in abuse cases - over stuff I could check up on. Some even >> tried to chat me up etc. Given we have known forever that many abuse cases >> are not independently witnessed and victims are incredibly easy to >> discredit, I'm amazed we don't routinely bug to get independent evidence - >> I even hid in a wardrobe to get one perp. Given people catch their nannies >> doing things wrong on CCTV, you'd think we could work a system out for >> abuse. >> >> I've often thought we could go back to something more like village life >> by gating off in our existing towns. >> >> Tony is probably the only one of us who gets hung regularly. >> >> On Thursday, October 30, 2014 8:09:33 AM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote: >>> >>> Good idea Tony, hope you are never the victim. (Hmmm) >>> >>> You have a job i would not envy, times are hard and will be getting >>> harder.. It seems to me there is an ever increasing desire for war from all >>> sides. >>> >>> Been thinking about my dad and the men's coop. Considering the down >>> slide in morality, the coop idea might have possibilities especially when >>> coupled with a gated community. >>> My idea is the community would be owned by the coop .. ( say a block of >>> apartments) To become a member of the gated or coop you have to live to a >>> set of moral commitments. (Including spousal abuse , drug use (guidelines >>> would need to be developed. (lol right after we hang Tony for something he >>> might do or could have done.. (",) >>> >>> All an >>> ~~ >>> do not murder, rape, enslave or harm others >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: "'facilitator' via \"Minds Eye\"" <[email protected]> >>> To: [email protected] >>> Sent: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 7:21 AM >>> Subject: Mind's Eye Re: Who can we tell? >>> >>> Iran has seem to have solved the problem by being able to hang the >>> victim. >>> >>> On Tuesday, October 28, 2014 9:40:49 PM UTC-4, archytas wrote: >>>> >>>> BBC's 'Panorama' produced a documentary last night on 'Baby P' - Peter >>>> Connelly killed at 17 months after much abuse 7 years ago. The >>>> perpetrators were jailed, scum of little interest. There was a serious >>>> case review, generally a hapless procedure of whitewash here. It now >>>> seems >>>> this and other reports were a fix to pin blame on social services - in >>>> fact >>>> all agencies involved were useless, social services perhaps less so than >>>> the politicians and others. Obviously, no reasonable society would want >>>> this kind of vicious cover-up at all or not to know what really went on >>>> for >>>> 7 years, given we should want to put things right (the 'learning lessons' >>>> rhetoric). >>>> >>>> Britain is an intensely secretive society. I don't even know why we >>>> got involved in the two world wars, let alone Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya and >>>> Syria. When I think of Gabby or Germans I have actually met, I have even >>>> less idea on the world wars. I doubt ignorance is my problem in this - >>>> it's just clear the general stuff we are given is bunk. When one >>>> researches social issues from war to child abuse, the reality shifts a >>>> long >>>> way from the history of Empire I was taught and the idea our politicians >>>> and bureaucracy operate in any competent way. >>>> >>>> In another case, in Rotherham, more than 1400 victims of child sexual >>>> exploitation were further abused by all the services they encountered. In >>>> this case, a young, female Home Office researcher had her work destroyed >>>> and was threatened by two police officers who said they were going to give >>>> her name and address to the abusers. There are so many other cases I >>>> doubt >>>> I could finish writing their outline within a couple of days. This is >>>> before one thinks about our banks and business practices, and revolting >>>> breaches of trust by priests, teachers and cops. >>>> >>>> Who can we even tell when it is almost impossible to think of any >>>> speedy and fair investigations and resolutions - or even admissions of >>>> wrong-doing by our establishments? This before you realise cops and other >>>> agencies quickly brief against victims and other complainants. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
