For consciousness a sense is necessary and that can be called an elementary
sort of brain.

On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:50 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote:

> There are organising processes long before brains in evolution RP - these
> might be conscious.  I'm 90% sure brains produce mind and the process is
> mechanistic and copyable.  Hard to say at the moment how close scientists
> are to substrate independent mind and uploading human mind to such.  One
> can imagine a society in which life builds itself - I suspect reflecting
> back from this much we regard as human would look very mechanistic rather
> than mystic.  Imagine a society with no childbirth - what would gender be,
> sex, family, economics, politics and other prize elements of libidinal
> literature?
>
>
> On Monday, December 22, 2014 2:44:44 AM UTC, RP Singh wrote:
>>
>> Consciousness is in the brain , which is an integral part of the body.
>> When we are brain- dead there is no consciousness. AS for the universal
>> Consciousness there is no such thing , rather there is the universal
>> unconsciousness , a state from which everything evolves
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 11:38 PM, Molly <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> "In the field of consciousness research—and also in physics and
>>> astronomy—we are breaking past the cause-and-effect, mechanistic way of
>>> interpreting things. In the biological sciences, there is a vitalism coming
>>> in that goes much further toward positing a common universal consciousness
>>> of which our brain is simply an organ. Consciousness does not come from the
>>> brain. The brain is an organ of consciousness. It focuses consciousness and
>>> pulls it in and directs it through a time and space field. But the
>>> antecedent of that is the universal consciousness of which we are all just
>>> a part."
>>>
>>> Joseph Campbell in Mythic World's, Modern Words, p. 286
>>>
>>> On Sunday, December 21, 2014 12:46:21 PM UTC-5, archytas wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I should say that my relationship with Hautes Etudes Commericiales was
>>>> not good.  The place was founded by Napoleon.  Key learning on the short
>>>> course is:
>>>>
>>>> Who is the individual
>>>> How to engage?
>>>> How to resist?
>>>> How to rearrange?
>>>> Why management matters
>>>>
>>>> One wonders how our smartest need to be taught this as adults, often 24
>>>> plus at HEC, and how schools produce us in the mystical state of not
>>>> knowing our arses from our elbows.
>>>>
>>>> On Sunday, December 21, 2014 5:33:19 PM UTC, archytas wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Agreed Molly - I can only critique your model out of respect for it
>>>>> not demanding gullible followership.  This film - a rather juvenile one -
>>>>> inspired by Chris Hedge's 'Death of the Liberal Class' does hint at some 
>>>>> of
>>>>> the structural problems - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hH6UynI5m7Y
>>>>> - it is Facilitaresque in some ways.  Tony might inject more humour in the
>>>>> bleakness and maybe more striking images.
>>>>>
>>>>> There remains the issue of mass forgetting and propaganda in the
>>>>> current moment.  The CEO of Apple has found it easy enough to come out as
>>>>> gay, but seems to have no conception of his oppression of others in the
>>>>> black heart pursuit of profit.  How has he come to that point?  How is the
>>>>> dirty-hands claque applauding current vile CEO behaviour created and what
>>>>> role does this play in scrutiny of the moment?  Does the construction of
>>>>> the moment bear any relation of the construction of other moments?  Does
>>>>> self matter at all if it is so malleable by 'outside structuration' - as
>>>>> often seems the case, say, in the prevention and destruction of worker
>>>>> solidarity by sensitivity-trained CEOs.  Hitler granted German unions a 
>>>>> May
>>>>> Day holiday and parade, then closed them down forever the day after.  The
>>>>> 'great self' working by beggaring all neighbours to weakness is surely not
>>>>> our quest.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.coursera.org/course/orgology  =  We are in constant
>>>>> relationship with many organizations. Our world is submitted to regular
>>>>> changes as organizations evolve, come and go. Understanding your
>>>>> memberships and attachments to organizations will help you act on your
>>>>> world. You'll learn how to evaluate the influence of organizations around
>>>>> you and how to transform your relationships to reach a stronger coherence.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know I would feel better in a course Molly was organising - but this
>>>>> is partly because I would not be the same person in such a group as the 
>>>>> one
>>>>> with an itchy trigger finger in respect of politicians and the overseers 
>>>>> of
>>>>> Chinese labour making i-Phones.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sunday, December 21, 2014 4:10:54 PM UTC, Molly wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am not sure that we need to rely so much on our historical
>>>>>> autobiography as current noetic make-up. In as much as everything we have
>>>>>> ever experienced leads us to this moment, maybe, but it is recognition in
>>>>>> this moment that lends our view. I also see no need to exclude other from
>>>>>> self, as it is through relatedness comes understanding of both in an
>>>>>> inclusive, not exclusive model.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Saturday, December 20, 2014 8:31:23 PM UTC-5, archytas wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As humans, we are intrigued by who we are and how we differ from
>>>>>>> other creatures of evolution. Among the capacities thought to be 
>>>>>>> uniquely
>>>>>>> human are autonoetic consciousness,
>>>>>>> the aspect of self-awareness that allows us to imagine our own
>>>>>>> experiences in different places at other times, and theory of mind 
>>>>>>> (ToM),
>>>>>>> which allows us to infer other people’s current
>>>>>>> mental states. The idea that ToM is closely related to, and that it
>>>>>>> may depend on, episodic memory and autonoetic consciousness seems 
>>>>>>> perfectly
>>>>>>> natural: that in order to imagine and make sense of other people’s
>>>>>>> thoughts, feelings, intentions, and actions, we must rely on our
>>>>>>> autobiographical recollections. The ability to consciously recollect 
>>>>>>> past
>>>>>>> personal happenings has been shown to be necessary for imagining 
>>>>>>> coherent
>>>>>>> and detailed personal happenings in the future. Both episodic memory and
>>>>>>> ToM emerge close in time in ontogenetic development. The neural 
>>>>>>> substrate
>>>>>>> on which the two abilities rely is in many ways strikingly similar.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This might just accord with Molly's notions of self-development -
>>>>>>> that one needs to get self right before making sense of or enjoying the
>>>>>>> world and understanding others and how we might choose to live.  
>>>>>>> Idealism
>>>>>>> can turn in on itself, with the world seen as cynical and frustrating 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> ideals - mysticism looking like thousands of years of flowery failure by
>>>>>>> people with time to think it up in personal situations of exploitation 
>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>> sweat off others' backs.  The grim Mike Leigh film 'Naked' makes such
>>>>>>> points.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> One might say that actually living and working alongside others is
>>>>>>> better than making it all up mystically from self could be a better 
>>>>>>> start
>>>>>>> than introspection amongst other chattering class types.  In respect of 
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> first paragraph above, I found a dire shortage of people who did have
>>>>>>> accurate autobiography to work from.  My own is particularly suspect.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sunday, December 21, 2014 12:33:27 AM UTC, archytas wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Amsterdam politicians have been apt to talk of levelling the red
>>>>>>>> lights and replacing them with a red carpet to the museums and 
>>>>>>>> theatre.  I
>>>>>>>> liked the piano barge.  In another form of mysticism one can see what 
>>>>>>>> lies
>>>>>>>> beneath.  Der Wallen is a place to see trafficking and exploitation, 
>>>>>>>> then
>>>>>>>> throw up.  I did a coffee shop instead - walking red light districts is
>>>>>>>> like unpaid overtime to me.  Took the technicolour yawner on a tram to 
>>>>>>>> see
>>>>>>>> some flower fields.  Beauty is fine until you think of it as 'not 
>>>>>>>> ugly',
>>>>>>>> thus making ugliness and disability some kind of sin.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Personally, I love mindful mindlessness as the basis of being able
>>>>>>>> to do nothing.  Tried it on this laptop the other day before effecting 
>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> cure with the soldering iron.  Mysticism can be good, but also
>>>>>>>> mystification.  Angels and devils again.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 20, 2014 10:27:49 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The museums of Amsterdam are great, somethings are good with much
>>>>>>>>> that is os question. I do not like wandering around their either. You 
>>>>>>>>> are
>>>>>>>>> right it is in the eye if the beholder. Greatfully it is out of 
>>>>>>>>> bicycling
>>>>>>>>> range Leiden is 10 km one way Den Haag (Den Hague) 10 km a different
>>>>>>>>> direction the difference between the two is Lieden is a city where as 
>>>>>>>>> Den
>>>>>>>>> Haag is i oversize town and does not qualify as a city by dutch law.
>>>>>>>>> Everything is a matter of perspective.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ~~
>>>>>>>>> لا القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد أو إيذاء الآخرين
>>>>>>>>> Do not murder, rape, enslave or harm others
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>>>>>>> From: archytas <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> To: [email protected]
>>>>>>>>> Sent: Sat, 20 Dec 2014 23:03
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Mind's Eye Re: Mysticism
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> A guy I didn't like walked through Amsterdam's red light district
>>>>>>>>> with me years ago.  He threw up over the nearest canal bridge.  I 
>>>>>>>>> rather
>>>>>>>>> liked his mystic summary of the place.  Reality, one suspects, is not 
>>>>>>>>> in
>>>>>>>>> the eye of the beholder.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Saturday, December 20, 2014 9:10:24 PM UTC, Allan Heretic wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To quote
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "mysticism is the art of union with Reality."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> "The old story of Eyes and No-Eyes is really the story of the
>>>>>>>>>> mystical and unmystical types. "No-Eyes" has fixed his attention on 
>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> fact that he is obliged to take a walk. For him the chief factor of
>>>>>>>>>> existence is his own movement along the road; a movement which he 
>>>>>>>>>> intends
>>>>>>>>>> to accomplish as efficiently and comfortably as he can. He asks not 
>>>>>>>>>> to know
>>>>>>>>>> what may
>>>>>>>>>> be on either side of the hedges. He ignores the caress of the
>>>>>>>>>> wind until it threatens to remove his hat. He trudges along, 
>>>>>>>>>> steadily,
>>>>>>>>>> diligently; avoiding the muddy pools, but oblivious of the light
>>>>>>>>>> which they reflect.
>>>>>>>>>>  "Eyes" takes the walk too: and for him it is a perpetual
>>>>>>>>>> revelation of beauty and wonder. The sunlight inebriates him, the 
>>>>>>>>>> winds
>>>>>>>>>> delight him, the very effort of the journey is a joy. Magic presences
>>>>>>>>>> throng the roadside, or cry salutations to him
>>>>>>>>>> from the hidden fields. The rich world through which he moves
>>>>>>>>>> lies in the fore-ground of his consciousness; and it gives up new 
>>>>>>>>>> secrets
>>>>>>>>>> to him at every step. "No-Eyes," when told of his adventures 
>>>>>>>>>> adventures,
>>>>>>>>>> usually refuses to believe that both have gone by the same road. He 
>>>>>>>>>> fancies
>>>>>>>>>> that his companion has been floating about in the air, or beset by
>>>>>>>>>> agreeable hallucinations. We shall never
>>>>>>>>>> persuade him to the contrary unless we persuade him to look for
>>>>>>>>>> himself."
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> ~~
>>>>>>>>>> لا القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد أو إيذاء الآخرين
>>>>>>>>>> Do not murder, rape, enslave or harm others
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  --
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> ---
>>>>>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>>>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>>>>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
>>>>>>>>> send an email to [email protected].
>>>>>>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  --
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>>
>>
>>  --
>
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> ""Minds Eye"" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to