Pluralism, that safe refuge of the undergraduate fixation.  It's almost as 
bad as Chris' 'I'm not gay, honest' position without the opportunity for 
some playground regression.  I'm not either, I hasten to add, though in the 
pluralist act, I wish I could have tried harder.  Men are otherwise so much 
more than women! Something I can say because my big sister never was quick 
enough to catch me - though having said this, the playground is always 
present.

So what's one's role in pluralism Ms Thiede?  To do as one is told in the 
politically correct rule by fiat of the harridan class?  Be the New Man 
worming his way in as a Gute-Mensch (incidentally Gabbs - you can have a 
good laugh using google to translate the German tests for such - and this, 
of course, is why I failed them, honest)

I'm an old man now. It doesn't get any better Chris, unless mind 
independent substrate works.  We move to sensitivity, perhaps, as a last 
strategy to pick up what remains of the 'market'!  Feign pluralism to enter 
a rabbit hole fantasy to listen to Gabby's correct versions of fairy tales 
and horror pics?  Lie across a puddle to let Julia Kristeva and Judith 
Butler's feet remain dry, taking the inevitable beating for the act of 
sexist chivalry?

Is gender really about male and female?  What of our very sensible 
homosexual friends?  Sensible at least in the sense they aren't going to 
burn the planet with carbon footprints in religious procreation fetish. 
 Though they tell me of others I am just not pluralist enough to want to 
share.  Of course, our all-American boy might be the only thing between 
women and the the unitary perspective of various cloaks and veils.  They 
could be emancipated by reading Kristeva in secret there, probably under 
the supervision of an older wife who has learned men shouldn't be taken 
literally when they say women are worthless, who thinks they are sowing 
pillows.

How does pluralism deal with real bigots?  Is Gabby secretly non-pluralist 
in her accusations?  We are just scum as men, though learn not to take this 
literally.  Do women really want to develop a reverse of the oppression of 
history?  Creepy.

On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:17:21 AM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote:
>
> :D Case and point, dear Gabs. My gender and identity are inextricably 
> bound.
>
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Gabby <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> In the presence of my American Hero ("I am a manly man") I cannot help 
>> but think of the monomyth and ask myself where Neil describes the plural 
>> perspectives that he announced in the header. The importance of the right 
>> narrative in internal as well as external marketing communications has 
>> increased a lot, wouldn't you agree?
>>
>> --
>>
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> ""Minds Eye"" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to [email protected].
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to