*laughing* You've so misread, me Arch, Surprising for you. I'm a 2.5 on the Kinsey Scale, not a 4 pretending to be a 0.
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:20 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > Pluralism, that safe refuge of the undergraduate fixation. It's almost as > bad as Chris' 'I'm not gay, honest' position without the opportunity for > some playground regression. I'm not either, I hasten to add, though in the > pluralist act, I wish I could have tried harder. Men are otherwise so much > more than women! Something I can say because my big sister never was quick > enough to catch me - though having said this, the playground is always > present. > > So what's one's role in pluralism Ms Thiede? To do as one is told in the > politically correct rule by fiat of the harridan class? Be the New Man > worming his way in as a Gute-Mensch (incidentally Gabbs - you can have a > good laugh using google to translate the German tests for such - and this, > of course, is why I failed them, honest) > > I'm an old man now. It doesn't get any better Chris, unless mind > independent substrate works. We move to sensitivity, perhaps, as a last > strategy to pick up what remains of the 'market'! Feign pluralism to enter > a rabbit hole fantasy to listen to Gabby's correct versions of fairy tales > and horror pics? Lie across a puddle to let Julia Kristeva and Judith > Butler's feet remain dry, taking the inevitable beating for the act of > sexist chivalry? > > Is gender really about male and female? What of our very sensible > homosexual friends? Sensible at least in the sense they aren't going to > burn the planet with carbon footprints in religious procreation fetish. > Though they tell me of others I am just not pluralist enough to want to > share. Of course, our all-American boy might be the only thing between > women and the the unitary perspective of various cloaks and veils. They > could be emancipated by reading Kristeva in secret there, probably under > the supervision of an older wife who has learned men shouldn't be taken > literally when they say women are worthless, who thinks they are sowing > pillows. > > How does pluralism deal with real bigots? Is Gabby secretly non-pluralist > in her accusations? We are just scum as men, though learn not to take this > literally. Do women really want to develop a reverse of the oppression of > history? Creepy. > > On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:17:21 AM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote: >> >> :D Case and point, dear Gabs. My gender and identity are inextricably >> bound. >> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Gabby <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> In the presence of my American Hero ("I am a manly man") I cannot help >>> but think of the monomyth and ask myself where Neil describes the plural >>> perspectives that he announced in the header. The importance of the right >>> narrative in internal as well as external marketing communications has >>> increased a lot, wouldn't you agree? >>> >>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
