I am not one for thinking the lady doeth protest too much in your case Chris, other than in the unending rib. For all the high talk of consciousness in humans, tiny amounts of DNA and flow of a mother's hormones affect us in important ways. There are XY females who have 'double DAX' chromosomes. Without SRY and DAX in normal proportion no testis is formed and there is a default to the female (though these women are sterile). Eider brothers increase our chances of being gay.
Come to think of it mate, you don't do American exceptionalness very well either! Must off to spread some pluralising lest Gabby thinks even less of me, or walk the dogs to the pub. Such difficult choices. On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 2:31:47 PM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote: > > *laughing* You've so misread, me Arch, Surprising for you. I'm a 2.5 on > the Kinsey Scale, not a 4 pretending to be a 0. > > > > On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:20 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Pluralism, that safe refuge of the undergraduate fixation. It's almost >> as bad as Chris' 'I'm not gay, honest' position without the opportunity for >> some playground regression. I'm not either, I hasten to add, though in the >> pluralist act, I wish I could have tried harder. Men are otherwise so much >> more than women! Something I can say because my big sister never was quick >> enough to catch me - though having said this, the playground is always >> present. >> >> So what's one's role in pluralism Ms Thiede? To do as one is told in the >> politically correct rule by fiat of the harridan class? Be the New Man >> worming his way in as a Gute-Mensch (incidentally Gabbs - you can have a >> good laugh using google to translate the German tests for such - and this, >> of course, is why I failed them, honest) >> >> I'm an old man now. It doesn't get any better Chris, unless mind >> independent substrate works. We move to sensitivity, perhaps, as a last >> strategy to pick up what remains of the 'market'! Feign pluralism to enter >> a rabbit hole fantasy to listen to Gabby's correct versions of fairy tales >> and horror pics? Lie across a puddle to let Julia Kristeva and Judith >> Butler's feet remain dry, taking the inevitable beating for the act of >> sexist chivalry? >> >> Is gender really about male and female? What of our very sensible >> homosexual friends? Sensible at least in the sense they aren't going to >> burn the planet with carbon footprints in religious procreation fetish. >> Though they tell me of others I am just not pluralist enough to want to >> share. Of course, our all-American boy might be the only thing between >> women and the the unitary perspective of various cloaks and veils. They >> could be emancipated by reading Kristeva in secret there, probably under >> the supervision of an older wife who has learned men shouldn't be taken >> literally when they say women are worthless, who thinks they are sowing >> pillows. >> >> How does pluralism deal with real bigots? Is Gabby secretly >> non-pluralist in her accusations? We are just scum as men, though learn >> not to take this literally. Do women really want to develop a reverse of >> the oppression of history? Creepy. >> >> On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:17:21 AM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote: >>> >>> :D Case and point, dear Gabs. My gender and identity are inextricably >>> bound. >>> >>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Gabby <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> In the presence of my American Hero ("I am a manly man") I cannot help >>>> but think of the monomyth and ask myself where Neil describes the plural >>>> perspectives that he announced in the header. The importance of the right >>>> narrative in internal as well as external marketing communications has >>>> increased a lot, wouldn't you agree? >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> >>> -- >> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> ""Minds Eye"" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
