I always thought Gabs had chosen an unlikely champion for her American Hero. :D
On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 10:18 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: > I am not one for thinking the lady doeth protest too much in your case > Chris, other than in the unending rib. For all the high talk of > consciousness in humans, tiny amounts of DNA and flow of a mother's > hormones affect us in important ways. There are XY females who have > 'double DAX' chromosomes. Without SRY and DAX in normal proportion no > testis is formed and there is a default to the female (though these women > are sterile). Eider brothers increase our chances of being gay. > > Come to think of it mate, you don't do American exceptionalness very well > either! Must off to spread some pluralising lest Gabby thinks even less of > me, or walk the dogs to the pub. Such difficult choices. > > > On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 2:31:47 PM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote: >> >> *laughing* You've so misread, me Arch, Surprising for you. I'm a 2.5 on >> the Kinsey Scale, not a 4 pretending to be a 0. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 7:20 AM, archytas <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Pluralism, that safe refuge of the undergraduate fixation. It's almost >>> as bad as Chris' 'I'm not gay, honest' position without the opportunity for >>> some playground regression. I'm not either, I hasten to add, though in the >>> pluralist act, I wish I could have tried harder. Men are otherwise so much >>> more than women! Something I can say because my big sister never was quick >>> enough to catch me - though having said this, the playground is always >>> present. >>> >>> So what's one's role in pluralism Ms Thiede? To do as one is told in >>> the politically correct rule by fiat of the harridan class? Be the New Man >>> worming his way in as a Gute-Mensch (incidentally Gabbs - you can have a >>> good laugh using google to translate the German tests for such - and this, >>> of course, is why I failed them, honest) >>> >>> I'm an old man now. It doesn't get any better Chris, unless mind >>> independent substrate works. We move to sensitivity, perhaps, as a last >>> strategy to pick up what remains of the 'market'! Feign pluralism to enter >>> a rabbit hole fantasy to listen to Gabby's correct versions of fairy tales >>> and horror pics? Lie across a puddle to let Julia Kristeva and Judith >>> Butler's feet remain dry, taking the inevitable beating for the act of >>> sexist chivalry? >>> >>> Is gender really about male and female? What of our very sensible >>> homosexual friends? Sensible at least in the sense they aren't going to >>> burn the planet with carbon footprints in religious procreation fetish. >>> Though they tell me of others I am just not pluralist enough to want to >>> share. Of course, our all-American boy might be the only thing between >>> women and the the unitary perspective of various cloaks and veils. They >>> could be emancipated by reading Kristeva in secret there, probably under >>> the supervision of an older wife who has learned men shouldn't be taken >>> literally when they say women are worthless, who thinks they are sowing >>> pillows. >>> >>> How does pluralism deal with real bigots? Is Gabby secretly >>> non-pluralist in her accusations? We are just scum as men, though learn >>> not to take this literally. Do women really want to develop a reverse of >>> the oppression of history? Creepy. >>> >>> On Thursday, February 5, 2015 at 5:17:21 AM UTC, Chris Jenkins wrote: >>>> >>>> :D Case and point, dear Gabs. My gender and identity are inextricably >>>> bound. >>>> >>>> On Thu, Feb 5, 2015 at 12:10 AM, Gabby <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> In the presence of my American Hero ("I am a manly man") I cannot help >>>>> but think of the monomyth and ask myself where Neil describes the plural >>>>> perspectives that he announced in the header. The importance of the right >>>>> narrative in internal as well as external marketing communications has >>>>> increased a lot, wouldn't you agree? >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> >>>>> --- >>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>>> an email to [email protected]. >>>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>> >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to [email protected]. >>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>> >> >> -- > > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > ""Minds Eye"" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups ""Minds Eye"" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
