My understanding of the gene flow  from africa there was a 3 way split part of 
the geno remained in africa another part went into what is middle east  the 
other part went into india via the southern route.. each of the three groups 
have distinct geno traits..  
India became the hot bed for geno development.. the N.G. DNA study is 
fascinating.. have been thinking a bought finding what my personal genetic 
history is..

تجنب. القتل والاغتصاب واستعباد الآخرين
Avoid; murder, rape and enslavement of others

-----Original Message-----
From: Hope Sunshine <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 8:12 AM
Subject: Re: Mind's Eye Re: We are going backwards.

Excellent research! It sheds a new light on a dark matter. What would we do 
without your valuable input?! Thank you Neil.

Am Mittwoch, 11. März 2015 00:22:47 UTC+1 schrieb archytas:
>
> In fact, several experts, such as Lluís Quintana-Murci,20 Vincent 
> Macaulay,21 Stephen Oppenheimer,22 Michael Petraglia,23 and their 
> associates, have in the last few years proposed that when Homo sapiens 
> migrated out of Africa, he first reached South-West Asia around 75,000 BP, 
> and from here, went on to other parts of the world. In simple terms, except 
> for Africans, all humans have ancestors in the North-West of the Indian 
> peninsula. In particular, one migration started around 50,000 BP towards 
> the Middle East and Western Europe:
>
> “indeed, nearly all Europeans — and by extension, many Americans — can 
> trace their ancestors to only four mtDNA lines, which appeared between 
> 10,000 and 50,000 years ago and originated from South Asia.” 24   India 
> acted “as an incubator of early genetic differentiation of modern humans 
> moving out of Africa.”26
>
> There is some superb Indian work that denies the Aryan myth, which can't 
> be supported by genetics or archaeology Indian biologist, Sanghamitra 
> Sahoo, headed eleven colleagues, including T. Kivisild and V. K. Kashyap, 
> for a study of the Y-DNA of 936 samples covering 77 Indian populations, 32 
> of them tribes.18 The authors left no room for doubt:
>
> “The sharing of some Y-chromosomal haplogroups between Indian and Central 
> Asian populations is most parsimoniously explained by a deep, common 
> ancestry between the two regions, with diffusion of some Indian- specific 
> lineages northward.”
>
> So the southward gene flow that had been imprinted on our minds for two 
> centuries was wrong, after all: the flow was out of, not into, India. The 
> authors continue:
> ...

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
""Minds Eye"" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to