On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: > 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: >> [...] >>> Ozkan, I would like to see the changes done to stdio.h, wchar.h (and >>> related _mingw_print_(push/pop).h on stable v2 branch, too. They are >>> fixing an issue we have with libstdc++, as without this patch >>> input/output stream of 'long double' types won't work. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Kai >> >> Done: Please make sure that I didn't screw-up anything. >> >> Regarding backports: >> >> - Do we want the _mingw_print_push.h, _mingw_print_pop.h, stdio.h and >> wchar.h changes in v1.x? > > Well, I would say no. But of course it is up to you. It fixes an > issue in for libstdc++, so it might be seen as bugfix. > >> - Do we want r4591 in v2.x and/or v1.x? > > Well, for v2 I think it make sense.
OK > For v1.x not sure. > Btw how long > we want to keep branch v1.x maintained? I'm merging obvious + bugfixes-only. For how long, well, until I get bored (and I am beginning to :) So, I'd like an admin decision: are the stdio and/or *.def/assert thingies eligible for v1? > > Regards, > Kai -- O.S. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
