2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: >>> [...] >>>> Ozkan, I would like to see the changes done to stdio.h, wchar.h (and >>>> related _mingw_print_(push/pop).h on stable v2 branch, too. They are >>>> fixing an issue we have with libstdc++, as without this patch >>>> input/output stream of 'long double' types won't work. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Kai >>> >>> Done: Please make sure that I didn't screw-up anything. >>> >>> Regarding backports: >>> >>> - Do we want the _mingw_print_push.h, _mingw_print_pop.h, stdio.h and >>> wchar.h changes in v1.x? >> >> Well, I would say no. But of course it is up to you. It fixes an >> issue in for libstdc++, so it might be seen as bugfix. >> >>> - Do we want r4591 in v2.x and/or v1.x? >> >> Well, for v2 I think it make sense. > > OK > >> For v1.x not sure. >> Btw how long >> we want to keep branch v1.x maintained? > > I'm merging obvious + bugfixes-only. For how long, well, until I get > bored (and I am beginning to :) > > So, I'd like an admin decision: are the stdio and/or *.def/assert > thingies eligible for v1? > >> >> Regards, >> Kai > > -- > O.S.
So, the *.def changes for _assert/_wassert are somthing important for v2.0 and for v1.0. The avoid a multiple definition link failure in some cases. The stdio changes are important for working 'long double' stream-input/output for libstdc++. So I see it as important for v2.x, and dependent to live-time of v1 also for it. Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
