2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:55 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: >> 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: >>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: >>>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> [...] >>>>>>>> Ozkan, I would like to see the changes done to stdio.h, wchar.h (and >>>>>>>> related _mingw_print_(push/pop).h on stable v2 branch, too. They are >>>>>>>> fixing an issue we have with libstdc++, as without this patch >>>>>>>> input/output stream of 'long double' types won't work. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>>> Kai >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Done: Please make sure that I didn't screw-up anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regarding backports: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Do we want the _mingw_print_push.h, _mingw_print_pop.h, stdio.h and >>>>>>> wchar.h changes in v1.x? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, I would say no. But of course it is up to you. It fixes an >>>>>> issue in for libstdc++, so it might be seen as bugfix. >>>>>> >>>>>>> - Do we want r4591 in v2.x and/or v1.x? >>>>>> >>>>>> Well, for v2 I think it make sense. >>>>> >>>>> OK >>>>> >>>>>> For v1.x not sure. >>>>>> Btw how long >>>>>> we want to keep branch v1.x maintained? >>>>> >>>>> I'm merging obvious + bugfixes-only. For how long, well, until I get >>>>> bored (and I am beginning to :) >>>>> >>>>> So, I'd like an admin decision: are the stdio and/or *.def/assert >>>>> thingies eligible for v1? >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> Kai >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> O.S. >>>> >>>> So, the *.def changes for _assert/_wassert are somthing important for >>>> v2.0 and for v1.0. The avoid a multiple definition link failure in >>>> some cases. >>>> >>>> The stdio changes are important for working 'long double' >>>> stream-input/output for libstdc++. So I see it as important for v2.x, >>>> and dependent to live-time of v1 also for it. >>> >>> Eh-hmm, hummm... You had to answer politically, hadn't you :)) >> >> :) >> >>> Will merge the assert stuff to v1 right away. stdio stuff will require >>> following the changes and applying manually, but I'll do it. >>> >>>> >>>> Kai >> >> Well, my question is here if 1.0 has at all the wscanf/wprintf/and >> scanf support for POSIX. If not, patches would need to be adjusted, or >> the missing functions need to be ported to v1.0. > > Printf yes. Scanf, no v1 doesn't have them. > > My initial thought was making v1 to behave properly without adding > the new functions, but I _can_ add the neww stuff too, if you want. > >> >> Kai >> > > -- > O.S.
Hmm, no. Just printf support is ok for v1. The other functions are indeed new feature Thanks, Kai ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ RSA(R) Conference 2012 Save $700 by Nov 18 Register now http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1 _______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
