2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote:
>> 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>:
>>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:27 PM, Kai Tietz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> 2011/11/13 Ozkan Sezer <[email protected]>:
>>>>> [...]
>>>>>> Ozkan,  I would like to see the changes done to stdio.h, wchar.h (and
>>>>>> related _mingw_print_(push/pop).h on stable v2 branch, too.  They are
>>>>>> fixing an issue we have with libstdc++, as without this patch
>>>>>> input/output stream of 'long double' types won't work.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Kai
>>>>>
>>>>> Done:  Please make sure that I didn't screw-up anything.
>>>>>
>>>>> Regarding backports:
>>>>>
>>>>> -  Do we want the _mingw_print_push.h, _mingw_print_pop.h, stdio.h and
>>>>>  wchar.h changes in v1.x?
>>>>
>>>> Well, I would say no.  But of course it is up to you.  It fixes an
>>>> issue in for libstdc++, so it might be seen as bugfix.
>>>>
>>>>> -  Do we want r4591 in v2.x and/or v1.x?
>>>>
>>>> Well, for v2 I think it make sense.
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>>   For v1.x not sure.
>>>>   Btw how long
>>>> we want to keep branch v1.x maintained?
>>>
>>> I'm merging obvious + bugfixes-only.  For how long, well, until I get
>>> bored (and I am beginning to :)
>>>
>>> So, I'd like an admin decision: are the stdio and/or *.def/assert
>>> thingies eligible for v1?
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Kai
>>>
>>> --
>>> O.S.
>>
>> So, the *.def changes for _assert/_wassert are somthing important for
>> v2.0 and for v1.0.  The avoid a multiple definition link failure in
>> some cases.
>>
>> The stdio changes are important for working 'long double'
>> stream-input/output for libstdc++.  So I see it as important for v2.x,
>> and dependent to live-time of v1 also for it.
>
> Eh-hmm, hummm... You had to answer politically, hadn't you :))

:)

> Will merge the assert stuff to v1 right away.  stdio stuff will require
> following the changes and applying manually, but I'll do it.
>
>>
>> Kai

Well, my question is here if 1.0 has at all the wscanf/wprintf/and
scanf support for POSIX. If not, patches would need to be adjusted, or
the missing functions need to be ported to v1.0.

Kai
>
> --
> O.S.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RSA(R) Conference 2012
Save $700 by Nov 18
Register now
http://p.sf.net/sfu/rsa-sfdev2dev1
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public

Reply via email to