On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Ruben Van Boxem
<[email protected]>wrote:
> Op 14-sep.-2013 13:50 schreef "Erik van Pienbroek" <[email protected]>
> het volgende:
>
> >
> > JonY schreef op za 14-09-2013 om 19:24 [+0800]:
> > > Daily automated tarballs already done by buildbot. Probably need to add
> > > something like svnversion to generate release revision info in a
> special
> > > header.
> >
> > I personally think daily releases are a bit too much bleeding edge. Of
> > course they're useful to developers and dedicated testers, but we can't
> > expect regular users to keep up with this. So for regular users we need
> > to have something that is between 'stable' and 'dev'. Therefore I think
> > having a bi-weekly 'testing' release would be a nice compromise which
> > can be realized with minimal effort.
>
> I think you guys are missing the main problem: the fact that for the last
> half year, trunk was necessary to build the latest GCC version. I'm
> confident the whole trunk stability question will descend into only murmurs
> if a stable version can be guaranteed that can be used to build GCC. This
> is I think the main reason a lot of people are complaining. This should be
> very much avoided in the future IMHO.
>
> Just my 2c,
>
> Ruben
>
> i'd like to hear nixman and alexey's perspective as it relates to the
mingw-builds binaries.
jon
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LIMITED TIME SALE - Full Year of Microsoft Training For Just $49.99!
1,500+ hours of tutorials including VisualStudio 2012, Windows 8, SharePoint
2013, SQL 2012, MVC 4, more. BEST VALUE: New Multi-Library Power Pack includes
Mobile, Cloud, Java, and UX Design. Lowest price ever! Ends 9/22/13.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=64545871&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
