在 2025-10-20 19:52, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Right, I see.What do others think - LH and Jacek? Should we add the Musl license to COPYING.MinGW-w64-runtime.txt and embrace it? Or should we try to remove/limit the use of Musl here?
The attributions of those two pieces of code are (same) Copyright © 2005-2020 Rich Felker, et al.I kinda think this is the only name that we have to retain. Legally we and MUSL both copy this code from Rich Felker, et al.
And the notices of these two pieces of code can be combined.
According to our existing COPYING.MinGW-w64-runtime.txt we already have some pieces of code included that do require attribution when redistributed in binary form, so this is just another license in the list.
Yes that's what I meant. -- Best regards, LIU Hao
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Mingw-w64-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
