On Mon, 20 Oct 2025, LIU Hao wrote:
在 2025-10-20 19:52, Martin Storsjö 写道:
Right, I see.
What do others think - LH and Jacek? Should we add the Musl license to
COPYING.MinGW-w64-runtime.txt and embrace it? Or should we try to
remove/limit the use of Musl here?
The attributions of those two pieces of code are (same)
Copyright © 2005-2020 Rich Felker, et al.
I kinda think this is the only name that we have to retain. Legally we and
MUSL both copy this code from Rich Felker, et al.
And the notices of these two pieces of code can be combined.
Hmm, which two notices do you think can be combined?
From looking at COPYING.MinGW-w64-runtime.txt, we have a bunch of notices
which are similar, but none that really is the exact same one, so unless
I'm missing something, I'd suggest just adding another section in the file
for Musl, with the full license from the header of one of these files.
// Martin
_______________________________________________
Mingw-w64-public mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mingw-w64-public
