Making, drinking tea and reading an opus magnum from mdff:
> just thoughts...
> 
> > It makes the kernel 500K bigger. I think that's in the FAQ somewhere. :)
> but really, would 500K hurt? who has an x86, that does not
> survive the waste of 500K RAM (even my 486DX had 64MB)?

it does not pay off

> are there any plans to support the kernel being loaded
> directly from a RAID partition in order to avoid that
> annoying mini-boot-partition which cannot be raided?

and what are you going to do in case the raid partition
itself gets broken? how are you going to repair if you
cannot boot the machine w/o any additional hardware attached?

cu

-- 
    paranoic mickey       (my employers have changed but, the name has remained)

Reply via email to