I read it once more, cause you say it. Situation not improved. 2011/6/29 Bret S. Lambert <bret.lamb...@gmail.com>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 08:56:38AM -0400, sven falempin wrote: > > This is almost equivalent. > > And that's probably the way I will do it. > > > > But as comp, is separated from base, I'm saying that this > minimal_base.tgz > > would be useful. > > Of course, only thinking about the talking around what to put in it, is > > discouraging. > > > > For example , i wouldn't put the package handling in it, nor apache. > > Somebody needs a "man release". > > ... > > Wait, that came out wrong... > > > > > > > 2011/6/29 Kevin Chadwick <ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk> > > > > > On Wed, 29 Jun 2011 04:57:30 -0400 > > > sven falempin wrote: > > > > > > > As i don't want to use a smaller 'spinover'. > > > > I ll probably will have to list some non usefull files, > > > > making upgrade more difficult, for my next use of openBSD. > > > > > > Depending how you upgrade. Making a minimal-base.tgz and not selecting > > > base.tgz should be pretty straight forward. > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail > > /\ > > > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\
