--- On Tue, 12/20/11, James Hartley <jjhart...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: James Hartley <jjhart...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Proper way to update system + ports? > To: "James Hozier" <guitars...@yahoo.com> > Cc: misc@openbsd.org > Date: Tuesday, December 20, 2011, 12:36 AM > On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 4:19 PM, > James Hozier <guitars...@yahoo.com> > wrote: > > > > > --- On Mon, 12/19/11, Jeremie > Courreges-Anglas > > > <jca+m...@wxcvbn.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > So -current Ports are not compatible with > -stable > > > Ports, right? > > > > Or am I wrong in presuming this? > > > > > > > > > > > Per FAQ 15.4.1: > > > > > > Do NOT check out a -current ports tree and expect > it to > > > work on a -release > > > or -stable system. > > > > > > > > > > How do I know if I have checked out the -current ports > tree or > > the -stable ports tree? > > > > Study FAQ 5.3.3. If no tagname was explicitly > provided in the CSV command > used, then the head of the CVS tree (in this case -current) > was downloaded. > >
So in my case, the command I used: # cvs -d$CVSROOT checkout -rOPENBSD_5_0 -P src ports included the -rOPENBSD_5_0 tag (-r) which indicates the -stable tree, right? And it applied to both src and ports so that I checked out the -stable version of both src and ports?
