On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 09:32:57AM -0500, Adam Thompson wrote: > On May 26, 2014 9:16:17 AM CDT, "Martin Schr??der" <mar...@oneiros.de> wrote: > >2014-05-26 15:52 GMT+02:00 Walter Souza <wsouz...@gmail.com>: > >> Why OpenBSD has no interest in using journal file system? > > > >http://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq8.html#Journaling > > > >Please read the FAQ. > > > >Best > > Martin > > Arguably, Walter might be better served by turning off softdep and ensuring > the filesystem is mounted 'sync'. > That doesn't solve the fsck speed issue, but it would help ensure no data > loss. > > Note to Walter: a journaling filesystem is not magic, you can (and will) > still experience data loss in uncontrolled shutdowns. Journaling just means > (roughly) that the metadata and data are written in the correct order so that > the filesystem is not in an inconsistent state... not that you won't lose > data. > (As already pointed out, softdep does much the same thing.) > > Does running FFS2 improve fsck times? Not something I've ever tested...
Yes it does, in most cases. But the most important is to use large block and/or fragments sizes, if that is acceptable for your use (it wastes space if you have a lot of small files). -Otto