>I find it far more useful and easier to work with and control than >"modern desktops" and wish modern programs went back to older config >standards and used text rather than *conf rubbish and that freedesktop >followed the older principles more closely when doing desktop >unification features etc..
I don't find fvwm to be problem either. However, while all new things are not necessarily better, it is usually best to follow defined practices in order to be unified with others. This is kind of idea of standards. What I meant was to clarify OpenBSD culture, priorities and coding practices and like to know whichever was the lesser of two evils: -simplicity vs. licensing purity -licensing purity vs. completeness -pragmatic licensing and completeness vs. licensing purity -correctness vs. simplicity -licensing purity vs. simplicity And if I understand correctly, priorities goes like this: simplicity > licensing purity > correctness > completeness
