On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 8:49 PM, Stuart Henderson <s...@spacehopper.org> wrote:
> On 2015-01-28, James Ryland Miller <james.ryland.mil...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> As a brand new OpenBSD user, I *love* how the flags work in rc.conf.local:
>>  "" says to me that the daemon is being called with no flags.
> Unfortunately you run into an inconsistency here, which occurs exactly
> because of this double-duty: "" actually means "use the default flags from
> the daemon_flags line in /etc/rc.d/somefile.rc".

Which is half of what opendaddy is missing.

I half-sympathize with his concerns. It _seems_ nice to have the
bundle of patch cables all connected and ready, and one switch
separate from the patch cable bundle to actually turn the box on and
patch it in.

"Seems" being the operational word, and the issue of where one is
looking for the switch being, perhaps, the missed point?

Joel Rees

Reply via email to