On Wed, 18 May 2016 18:08:52 +0200 Joakim Frostegård <joakim.frosteg...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Everybody, thanks for the constructive feedback. As for the snarky > neo-luddite remarks, they were entertaining too ;-) No, I'm not a > product of new-age college professors wanting to demolish the > Colosseum., though HTML5 and mobile support is nice. > > When it comes to searching the archives, I did have a look but not a > very long one. Sorry about that. > > I changed the colors a bit. Now, the contrast between the links and > the background is a lot better. > The colors look better now. > The site works OK in Dillo too, though the old site still looks > better. Then, I don't think doing layout solely with tables belongs > in 2016, and browsers should support floating elements. > > The site works fine in links, elinks and w3m too, except that the > header is shown twice. I think it's more important to have good > mobile support than perfect console browser support. Actually, bad > mobile support is one of the biggest problems with the current site. > I personally like the suggested redesign overall. It still feels light and minimalistic. Thank you for spending time on it and not being afraid to hit misc@ for feedback :) In general, what I feel is missing is a place to have the server rack photo there (see lower left on current website) and a way to integrate the current release theme (main site sports a 5.9 banner now). Regards, Adam
