On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 07:25:21PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote: > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:56:18 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > <i...@juanfra.info> > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 06:39:01PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote: > > > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 17:13:44 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > > > <i...@juanfra.info> > > > > On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 05:20:20PM +0300, li...@wrant.com wrote: > > > > > Mon, 1 Jul 2019 00:46:33 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > > > > > <i...@juanfra.info> > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 30, 2019 at 09:09:08PM +0000, Roderick wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > No. It is *you* that do not understand what X11 is and want it > > > > > > > death. > > > > > > > A very destructive attitude. > > > > > > > > > > > > You're the only one with a destructive attitude here. I'm trying to > > > > > > help > > > > > > you because usually people doesn't understand how wayland works. > > > > > > > > > > You can't do without YOU understanding basics of X11, do something > > > > > else.. > > > > > Juan, I don't trust your lack of any qualification for even feature > > > > > bait. > > > > > > > > Show me where I am wrong. Enlighten us with your qualification No Name. > > > > > > > > > > Here you go wrong on all points.. Next time, bring 100% more experience. > > > > > > Sat, 29 Jun 2019 20:45:14 +0200 Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado > > > <i...@juanfra.info> > > > > > > > > The missing parts are not so big but nobody is working on that. > > > > > > > > I dont' know why people are so sad. X11 should have died long time ago. > > > > > > > > > > This is not exactly inspirational, neither convincing. Try again later.. > > > Juan, I still can not find one single piece of text where you were right. > > > > > > > Can you show me what missing Wayland part is bigger than DRM+Mesa+LLVM?. > > > > After the personal attack, I was hoping a more elaborated answer. > > > > All messages sent to you only through the list in public.. > > You can not see it: you are wrong. Now, cover your ears. >
No, you three (gwes, Roderick and "lists") are wrong, I see assholes protecting a bloat called X. The only thing we miss for Wayland in base is libxml and it's not as bloated as shit called DRM, Mesa and X.org, so it's perfectly acceptable, but the masturbating monkey like you doesn't want security, you want a slow, insecure and bloated shit called X. Juan, if you help me with wscons then we can have working Wayland compositors running outside of X session in 2019 at OpenBSD.
