I have a question, I'm trying to recompile a flavor of bind but I can't find the port because its part of the base install.
Could you point me in the right direction on how I would do it ? I downloaded the bind source and compiled it but obviously the original version that ships on base should be un-installed from openbsd first.. I don't know how to do it because its part of the base system. Sorry if I'm posting in the wrong area if so please direct me to the proper area. I don't have experinece interacting with the community here. -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gilles Chehade Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 7:24 PM To: Karthik Kumar Cc: misc@openbsd.org Subject: Re: Real men don't attack straw men Sorry Karthik but I prefer to keep misc@ cc-ed as it is archived and people will later be able to know that you are a troll when they do a lookup about you. The page you are refering to mentions three new ports. If you had spent your time doing something as productive as reading the faq instead of talking out of your ass, you'd have learnt that these are optionnal packages that (here's the tricky part:) *DO NOT COME SHIPPED WITH THE OPERATING SYSTEM*. That's right. If you install OpenBSD and start firefox, you'll get a command not found. Then if you install firefox and go to a flash enabled site, you will see nothing. If you have it installed, then it means that at some point YOU decided to download the optional ports infrastructure and explicitely requested installation of the flashplayer. Please, do not comment further as it is annoying and only points out the fact that you don't know what you are talking about and don't know how to read. Gilles Karthik Kumar a C)crit : > okay. so the exact name might vary. take a look at this: > http://www.undeadly.org/cgi?action=article&sid=20070907181228 > > > On 12/14/07, Gilles Chehade <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 05:02:45AM +0530, Karthik Kumar wrote: >> >>> Hey, we could all use the same arguments and call OpenBSD hypocritical: >>> >>> say no to blobs (it's even on the nvidia-wallpaper!) but say yes to >>> libflashplayer.so (which is of course secure because it's obscure, >>> but more than that it's a necessity for so many users which makes it >>> ethical to use it anyway) => maybe this will be the next misc@ >>> thread >>> >>> So who's the hypocrite huh? These spats will never end. >>> >>> And for those who didn't notice, rms takes about a day to respond to >>> his emails; So please don't scream if you don't get a timely reply. >>> >>> Karthik >>> >>> >> sparky:gilles {101} find /usr/lib -name 'libflashplayer.so.*' >> sparky:gilles {102} find /usr/local/lib -name 'libflashplayer.so.*' >> sparky:gilles {103} >> >> now, please go back to sleep. >> >> -- >> Gilles Chehade >> http://www.evilkittens.org/ >> http://www.evilkittens.org/blog/gilles/ >> >> -- SCHNEIER FACT #68: Bruce Schneier writes his personal journal in Linear A.
