2009/5/17 Toma Bodar <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>:
> I know,that's why they choose BSD-style licenced OS ;-)

Yes, because China's respect for copyright and intellectual property
is legendary.

-HKS


> 2009/5/17 Cem Kayali <cemkay...@eticaret.com.tr>:
>>
>> Do you really think Chineese governmnt make source public? Not all of
course
>> ;)
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Jesus Sanchez, 05/17/09 20:58:
>>>
>>> TomC!E! BodE>C!r escribiC3:
>>>>
>>>> After quick search on web it looks like it's based on FreeBSD 5.3
>>>> (initial version) with Windows like GUI.So it doesn't looks so secure
>>>> now :-) But government agencies must have reason to receive money so
>>>> why don't make "wave" about dangerous China with their new
>>>> ultra-hyper-super secure system? Ofcourse that there can be
>>>> interesting modifications.Maybe I will try it in Qemu :-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> the chinese government really feels so vulnerable against U.S.?
>>> i mean, they say it like "the WWIII will begin soon and we need
>>> to defend us on the cyberspace with our super-secure OS"
>>>
>>> and after all they based it on FreeBSD? I'm a OpenBSD user and
>>> I really feel that I've enought privacy, don't need a
>>> super-secret-ultra-secure OS
>>> nor to say "Made In China" xD
>>>
>>>
>>>> Dne 17. kvD ten 2009 19:28 TomC!E! BodE>C!r <tomas.bod...@gmail.com>
>>>> napsal(a):
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Everyone can try it
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
http://www.honeytechblog.com/downlod-kylin-operating-system-by-chinaqingbo-wu
>>>> /
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2009/5/17 Duncan Patton a Campbell <campb...@neotext.ca>:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I just noticed this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.physorg.com/news161355225.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> about a "secure" os that's been under
>>>>>> development in China since around 2k
>>>>>> and is now being deployed by the Chinese
>>>>>> Gov.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Interestingly, it is built for a "hardened"
>>>>>> CPU that, I'd guess, lacks many of the advanced
>>>>>> "features" of iNTel architecture cpus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Anybody have any more info on this?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dhu

Reply via email to