On Sep 23, 2019 11:58 AM, Joerg Jung <m...@umaxx.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 18. Sep 2019, at 09:38, gil...@poolp.org wrote:
> > 
> > September 17, 2019 11:41 PM, "Edgar Pettijohn" <ed...@pettijohn-web.com> 
> > wrote:
> > 
> >> On Sep 17, 2019 9:05 AM, Gilles Chehade <gil...@poolp.org> wrote:
> >> 
> >>> Hello,
> >>> 
> >>> Is there anyone using table-passwd for _any_ other purposes than sharing
> >>> with Dovecot ?
> >>> 
> >>> I have built a fully virtual setup which shares credentials with Dovecot
> >>> and since I managed to do it _without_ table-passwd I'm wondering if the
> >>> table backend is really useful and if it was not created because soneone
> >>> had overlooked the first few lines of the Dovecot documentation stating:
> >>> 
> >>> "For a password database, it's enough to have only the user and password
> >>> fields."
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> Not actually using it, but for dovecot to use it as a userdb as well as a 
> >> passdb it needs the
> >> additional fields.
> >> 
> > 
> > ok so I'm misunderstanding the use-case, let me explain why I'm curious:
> > 
> > I wrote table-passwd because I was told that if you wanted to create a 
> > virtual setup,
> > backed by one single user, you needed to have a passwd(5)-format file for 
> > Dovecot and
> > share that with OpenSMTPD.
> > 
> > But then I did a fully virtual setup for myself and I didn't use 
> > table-passwd, so the
> > rationale behind it falls a bit apart for me, unless there's other 
> > use-cases.
> > 
> > On my setup, file /etc/mail/accounts is a simple two columns 
> > username/password table:
> > 
> > # head -1 /etc/mail/accounts.txt 
> > gil...@poolp.org:$2b$09$0ek9ozmo1u0mSsiRo/z2AumROLK.70T9A6bP3mFDqb38L0sC5RvT6
> > #
> > 
> [...]
> > 
> > This allows both OpenSMTPD and Dovecot to authenticate accounts that are 
> > not system
> > users, allows OpenSMTPD to drop mail to a maildir owned by system account 
> > in charge
> > of virtual accounts and allows Dovecot to properly serve these accounts.
> > 
> > Am I missing your use-cases here ?
> > 
>
> Yes, this is perfectly fine for simpler cases, but as someone else 
> mentioned in this thread earlier already:
> Dovecot passdb knows about additional fields, in particular 
> to specify user specific quotas (usually rather important in 
> virtual user setups). table-passwd can handle/ignore these 
> extra_fields correctly. So my passwd file lines looks like this:
> f...@bar.de:$2b$****::::::userdb_quota_rule=*:storage=10G
>
>
>

I'm guessing you are looking for fat to trim. Personally I like it as is. Just 
my two cents.

Edgar

Reply via email to