Hi Deqiang,

we are aware of the fact that there are some "flipping issues" in the current 
master and will take care of them as soon as possible.

Regards,
Thomas


From: Deqiang Xiao [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2013 15:50
To: Kilgus, Thomas
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mitk-users] Camera intrinsic parameters in 
mitkToFDistanceImageToPointSetFilter.cpp of ToFProcessing module

Dear Thomas,

Meaning of my problem regarding value of point in y-axis is that value is 
negative when  pixel(the point's corresponding)  located in the first and 
second quadrant of rgb image. It seems this problem is related to 
bug-13567(http://bugs.mitk.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13567) .

Regards,
Deqiang


2013/1/10 Deqiang Xiao <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Dear Thomas,

Yes, you are right. I did the experiment with the default parameters you 
provided and parameters of my own kinect, it shows that the output of latter is 
better than former, while they are all much better than that with PMD CamCube 
Camera parameters. But, I find another problem for getting 3D point by 
"PointSet" in "ToF Measurement" of ToFUtil, the problem is that value of point 
in y-axis is negative when I select a location above the center of  kinect( It 
seems that coordinate of kinect follows right-hand rule, which means the value 
of point in y-axis is positive when the point located above the center of 
kinect).

Regards,
Deqiang
2013/1/10 Kilgus, Thomas 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
calibration


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Master HTML5, CSS3, ASP.NET, MVC, AJAX, Knockout.js, Web API and
much more. Get web development skills now with LearnDevNow -
350+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Microsoft MVPs and experts.
SALE $99.99 this month only -- learn more at:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122812
_______________________________________________
mitk-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mitk-users

Reply via email to